H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Richard Krajicek vs Carl Uwe Steeb H2H: 2-1
Richard Krajicek holds a 2–1 lead over Carl Uwe Steeb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Richard Krajicek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 1993 Monte Carlo Masters third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1993* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Richard Krajicek | 7-5 6-1 | Carl Uwe Steeb | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1993* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Richard Krajicek | 6-3 6-3 | Carl Uwe Steeb | Match data |
| May 13, 1992* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Carl Uwe Steeb | 6-4 5-7 6-2 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Carl Uwe Steeb | #1,355 | #14 | 1,095 | 1,920 | 189 | 190 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Krajicek | Carl Uwe Steeb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #73 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 | 1993 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #94 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 | 1994 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #89 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 | 1995 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #67 | 1,660 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 | 1996 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #179 | 1,540 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |