H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Richard Krajicek vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 2-4

Cedric Pioline holds a 4–2 lead over Richard Krajicek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 3–1 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1999 Rotterdam fourth round 7-6(5) 7-6(9).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Krajicek
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 19, 1999* Rotterdam ATP 250 R16 Carpet Cedric Pioline #18 7-6(5) 7-6(9) Richard Krajicek #10 Match data
Oct 16, 1998* Vienna ATP 250 R16 Carpet Cedric Pioline #16 7-6(1) 6-7(5) 6-4 Richard Krajicek #11 Match data
May 31, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Cedric Pioline #17 6-3 6-2 7-5 Richard Krajicek #10 Match data
Aug 6, 1997* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Richard Krajicek #15 6-3 6-4 Cedric Pioline #23 Match data
Mar 8, 1996* Rotterdam ATP 250 R16 Carpet Cedric Pioline #35 7-6(5) 6-3 Richard Krajicek #26 Match data
Nov 2, 1995* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Richard Krajicek #14 4-6 6-4 7-5 Cedric Pioline #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,044 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 0 14 17
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Krajicek Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,745 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,950 0 3 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,888 0 4 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,883 0 7 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,832 0 9 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,876 1 10 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,969 1 13 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,975 1 15 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,879 1 17 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,885 1 17 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,839 1 17 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,762 1 17 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5