H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Richard Krajicek vs Darren Cahill H2H: 1-2
Darren Cahill holds a 2–1 lead over Richard Krajicek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Darren Cahill leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Darren Cahill won the 1994 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-2 5-7 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1994* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Darren Cahill | 6-3 6-2 5-7 7-6(5) | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
| Jan 20, 1991* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Richard Krajicek | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 7-6(4) | Darren Cahill | Match data |
| Jan 11, 1991* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Darren Cahill | 6-4 6-4 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Darren Cahill | #538 | #22 | 823 | 1,893 | 131 | 115 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Krajicek | Darren Cahill | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #132 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #82 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #27 | 1,793 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 | 1990 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 | 1991 | 15–6 | 71.4% | #91 | 1,869 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #192 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |