H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richard Krajicek vs David Prinosil H2H: 5-2

Richard Krajicek holds a 5–2 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 2–1 on carpet and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 2000 Halle final 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Krajicek
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
David Prinosil
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 18, 2000* Halle ATP 250 F Grass David Prinosil #130 6-3 6-2 Richard Krajicek #32 Match data
Apr 16, 1999* Tokyo ATP 250 R16 Hard Richard Krajicek #4 6-4 6-4 David Prinosil #75 Match data
Feb 13, 1998* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R16 Carpet Richard Krajicek #9 6-7(2) 6-4 6-2 David Prinosil #93 Match data
Apr 19, 1997* Tokyo ATP 250 QF Hard Richard Krajicek #6 6-4 6-3 David Prinosil #48 Match data
Mar 7, 1997* Rotterdam ATP 250 R16 Carpet Richard Krajicek #7 7-6(7) 7-6(5) David Prinosil #46 Match data
Oct 17, 1996* Ostrava ATP 250 R32 Carpet David Prinosil #58 6-4 6-3 Richard Krajicek #8 Match data
Apr 19, 1996* Tokyo ATP 250 R16 Hard Richard Krajicek #27 7-5 6-0 David Prinosil #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,044 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 0 14 17
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,800 165 208 44.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Krajicek David Prinosil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,745 0 1 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,584 0 0
20 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,950 0 3 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,633 0 0
21 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,888 0 4 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,630 0 0
22 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,883 0 7 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1
23 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,832 0 9 1996 24–23 51.1% #39 1,779 0 2
24 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,876 1 10 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,633 0 2
25 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,969 1 13 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,622 0 2
26 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,975 1 15 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,672 0 2
27 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,879 1 17 2000 22–17 56.4% #38 1,788 0 3
28 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,885 1 17 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,606 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,593 0 3
30 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,839 1 17 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,521 0 3
31 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,762 1 17 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,515 0 3