H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Richard Krajicek vs Diego Perez H2H: 0-1
Diego Perez holds a 1–0 lead over Richard Krajicek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Diego Perez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Diego Perez won the 1992 Roland Garros third round 6-4 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
URU
Age 64
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Diego Perez | 6-4 6-1 6-1 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Diego Perez | #1,373 | #27 | 389 | 1,830 | 195 | 213 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Krajicek | Diego Perez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #52 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 | 1986 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #116 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #142 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #128 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 | 1993 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #253 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #661 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |