H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Richard Krajicek vs Gilad Bloom H2H: 2-0
Richard Krajicek holds a 2–0 lead over Gilad Bloom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 1992 Miami Masters second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1992* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Richard Krajicek | 6-3 6-3 | Gilad Bloom | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1991* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Richard Krajicek | 7-5 6-3 | Gilad Bloom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Krajicek | Gilad Bloom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |