H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Richard Krajicek vs J. Fitzgerald H2H: 0-1
J. Fitzgerald holds a 1–0 lead over Richard Krajicek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, J. Fitzgerald leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, J. Fitzgerald won the 1991 Tokyo Outdoor second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 65
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 1991* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | J. Fitzgerald | 6-1 6-4 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| J. Fitzgerald | #765 | #25 | 321 | 1,857 | 230 | 221 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Krajicek | J. Fitzgerald | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #305 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #60 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #43 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 | 1985 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #91 | 1,665 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,654 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 | 1987 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 | 1988 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,778 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #188 | 1,587 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #205 | 1,610 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 | 1992 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #166 | 1,618 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #298 | 1,582 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,575 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 |