H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richard Krajicek vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 4-0

Richard Krajicek holds a 4–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 2000 Halle third round 6-7(11) 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Krajicek
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 15, 2000* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Richard Krajicek #32 6-7(11) 6-4 6-4 Jeff Tarango #56 Match data
Feb 25, 1999* London ATP 250 R32 Carpet Richard Krajicek #9 6-4 6-2 Jeff Tarango #67 Match data
Oct 8, 1994* Sydney Indoor ATP 250 QF Hard Richard Krajicek #32 6-1 7-5 Jeff Tarango #85 Match data
Aug 8, 1992* Los Angeles ATP 250 QF Hard Richard Krajicek #15 6-7(4) 6-0 3-1 (ret.) Jeff Tarango #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,044 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 0 14 17
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Krajicek Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,745 0 1 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,950 0 3 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,888 0 4 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,883 0 7 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,832 0 9 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,876 1 10 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,969 1 13 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,975 1 15 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,879 1 17 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,885 1 17 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,839 1 17 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,762 1 17 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2