H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Richard Krajicek vs Jim Grabb H2H: 2-0

Richard Krajicek holds a 2–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 1992 Japan Open round of 16 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Krajicek
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richard Krajicek #30 6-4 6-3 Jim Grabb #77 Match data Apr 10, 1992* R16 Japan Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Richard Krajicek #45 6-2 7-6(2) 6-1 Jim Grabb #86 Match data Jan 17, 1992* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,048 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 5 9 17
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Krajicek Jim Grabb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,746 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,949 0 3 — — — — — — —
21 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,884 0 4 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0
22 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,882 0 7 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0
23 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,834 0 9 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1
24 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,878 1 10 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1
25 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,958 1 13 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1
26 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,983 1 15 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1
27 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,881 1 17 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1
28 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,879 1 17 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2
30 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,836 1 17 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2
31 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,761 1 17 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Krajicek Jim Grabb
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1991 17 9 26 65.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 28 10 38 73.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 14 8 22 63.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1994 11 4 15 73.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1995 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 18 4 22 81.8% 1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
24 1996 15 9 24 62.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 9 1 10 90.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1997 21 8 29 72.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 15 5 20 75.0% 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1998 18 5 23 78.3% 9 4 13 69.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1999 30 12 42 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 2 8 75.0% 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
28 2000 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2002 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 2003 5 6 11 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 189 91 280 67.5% 76 43 119 63.9% 63 26 89 70.8% 80 47 127 63.0% — 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 530/615 of Richard Krajicek's and 169/198 of Jim Grabb's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Krajicek Jim Grabb
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1991 40/46 9.2 4.0 55.3% 77.4% 51.6% 57.8% 43.4% 65.8% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 61/71 11.0 3.5 58.4% 79.2% 54.5% 65.0% 41.3% 68.9% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 46/56 10.3 4.3 60.2% 81.1% 50.7% 57.7% 47.2% 69.1% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1994 42/45 11.7 4.0 55.0% 81.2% 50.6% 70.8% 47.6% 67.7% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1995 54/60 11.5 3.1 59.0% 79.1% 51.2% 70.1% 41.8% 67.7% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1996 61/70 12.8 3.4 58.1% 82.1% 49.2% 60.1% 41.1% 68.2% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1997 61/69 14.3 3.1 57.8% 85.0% 53.3% 65.0% 43.2% 71.7% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1998 50/61 14.9 3.4 59.8% 82.3% 53.6% 57.2% 44.1% 70.7% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 47/62 13.4 2.8 61.1% 82.0% 52.2% 64.0% 43.5% 70.4% 37.8% 1991 37/42 7.0 4.0 64.9% 72.2% 48.6% 59.8% 37.6% 64.1% 36.3%
28 2000 35/41 14.9 3.4 58.6% 82.2% 55.1% 59.5% 35.2% 71.0% 36.7% 1992 50/55 6.4 3.1 64.6% 75.8% 47.8% 54.4% 35.0% 66.0% 35.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 13/15 5.1 3.0 70.6% 65.7% 48.5% 60.1% 52.2% 59.9% 35.2%
30 2002 12/13 15.7 6.6 53.3% 81.8% 49.0% 67.7% 43.4% 66.1% 34.1% 1994 33/38 5.2 3.0 68.5% 69.1% 45.9% 59.0% 49.0% 61.9% 35.7%
31 2003 21/21 12.9 5.4 52.1% 79.9% 48.0% 67.4% 45.6% 64.4% 34.7% 1995 20/23 5.7 2.9 64.8% 68.9% 47.3% 65.1% 27.2% 61.3% 32.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 10/16 7.1 5.5 65.1% 74.5% 44.0% 58.1% 52.2% 63.5% 33.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 6/9 4.3 6.5 63.9% 71.6% 34.5% 48.0% 42.7% 58.1% 32.5%
Career — 530/615 12.5 3.6 58.0% 81.2% 51.9% 63.2% 43.0% 68.9% 37.2% — 169/378 6.1 3.5 65.9% 71.9% 46.9% 58.2% 40.0% 63.3% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Krajicek Jim Grabb
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1991 1746 141.4 +4.23 -0.01 1.092 51.2% -23 -142 -131 56.0% +0.54 9–9 (50%) 10–12 (45%) 101.8 -1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 1949 161.3 +6.70 +1.48 1.220 53.2% +15 -266 -275 63.5% +0.94 14–9 (61%) 18–17 (51%) 104.9 -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 1885 155.4 +6.73 +0.19 1.222 53.3% -30 +5 -123 60.6% +0.72 11–8 (58%) 14–15 (48%) 98.9 -1.17 1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16
22 1994 1883 152.7 +5.16 +0.47 1.178 52.9% -19 +63 -64 69.4% +1.08 2–6 (25%) 12–12 (50%) 93.0 +0.23 1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 +0.05
23 1995 1835 148.6 +4.66 -0.97 1.118 51.8% +66 +23 -81 64.6% +0.80 11–8 (58%) 16–15 (52%) 98.8 +1.78 1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) 107.9 +1.31
24 1996 1879 156.6 +5.72 +0.26 1.174 52.7% -76 +74 +133 64.5% +0.84 11–4 (73%) 22–16 (58%) 108.1 +0.05 1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 100.0 -0.31
25 1997 1958 153.7 +8.64 +0.43 1.320 54.0% -8 -40 +49 69.5% +1.20 8–6 (57%) 20–22 (48%) 98.1 -0.46 1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) 100.2 -1.18
26 1998 1984 154.9 +7.61 +0.20 1.259 53.5% -7 -50 +57 69.1% +1.13 17–6 (74%) 24–12 (67%) 107.8 +0.64 1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) 98.1 -0.10
27 1999 1881 155.6 +6.78 +0.75 1.279 53.6% +61 -29 +52 66.0% +1.16 5–7 (42%) 12–15 (44%) 89.7 +0.83 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) 91.2 +0.72
28 2000 1880 150.8 +7.72 -0.11 1.266 53.1% +52 -32 +50 61.1% +0.86 5–4 (56%) 8–12 (40%) 94.8 -1.68 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) 105.6 +1.42
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) 97.3 +0.36
30 2002 1837 125.9 +3.14 -0.36 1.008 50.0% +25 — +75 59.5% +0.32 2–3 (40%) 5–3 (63%) 98.6 -0.73 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) 98.4 +0.09
31 2003 1762 123.4 +1.62 -1.25 0.973 49.6% +3 +73 +168 48.1% +0.06 5–2 (71%) 5–8 (38%) 98.1 -0.47 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) 91.9 -1.25
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 98.0 +0.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17
Career — 2049 158.4 +6.18 +0.22 1.195 52.8% +5 -20 +4 63.9% +0.89 100–72 (58%) 166–159 (51%) 99.5 -0.67 — 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.