H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Richard Krajicek vs Leander Paes H2H: 1-0

Richard Krajicek holds a 1–0 lead over Leander Paes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richard Krajicek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 1997 Dubai Tennis Championships round of 32 5-7 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Krajicek
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Leander Paes
IND Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richard Krajicek #6 5-7 6-4 6-2 Leander Paes #105 Match data Feb 13, 1997* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,048 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 5 9 17
Leander Paes #1,102 #73 611 1,737 53 77 40.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Krajicek Leander Paes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1991 1–2 33.3% #278 1,492 0 0
19 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,746 0 1 1992 0–1 0.0% #194 1,486 0 0
20 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,949 0 3 1993 1–3 25.0% #260 1,483 0 0
21 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,884 0 4 1994 2–3 40.0% #139 1,495 0 0
22 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,882 0 7 1995 3–9 25.0% #130 1,486 0 0
23 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,834 0 9 1996 13–11 54.2% #129 1,654 0 0
24 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,878 1 10 1997 13–18 41.9% #122 1,634 0 0
25 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,958 1 13 1998 13–10 56.5% #91 1,659 0 1
26 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,983 1 15 1999 3–9 25.0% #142 1,562 0 1
27 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,881 1 17 2000 3–6 33.3% #188 1,537 0 1
28 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,879 1 17 2001 1–2 33.3% #299 1,595 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #998 1,579 0 1
30 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,836 1 17 2003 0–1 0.0% #1032 1,571 0 1
31 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,761 1 17 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #1102 1,550 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Krajicek Leander Paes
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1991 17 9 26 65.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1992 28 10 38 73.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1993 14 8 22 63.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1994 11 4 15 73.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1995 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1995 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 18 4 22 81.8% 1996 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1996 15 9 24 62.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 9 1 10 90.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 1997 4 11 15 26.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0%
25 1997 21 8 29 72.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 15 5 20 75.0% 1998 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1998 18 5 23 78.3% 9 4 13 69.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 1999 30 12 42 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 2 8 75.0% 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2000 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 5 6 11 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 189 91 280 67.5% 76 43 119 63.9% 63 26 89 70.8% 80 47 127 63.0% — 25 50 75 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 18 13 31 58.1% 9 10 19 47.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 530/615 of Richard Krajicek's and 106/129 of Leander Paes's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Krajicek Leander Paes
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 3/3 3.0 3.7 58.6% 71.0% 47.9% 77.5% 23.3% 61.5% 35.9%
19 1991 40/46 9.2 4.0 55.3% 77.4% 51.6% 57.8% 43.4% 65.8% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 61/71 11.0 3.5 58.4% 79.2% 54.5% 65.0% 41.3% 68.9% 37.9% 1993 4/4 3.0 4.8 66.2% 67.5% 51.2% 45.8% 42.6% 61.8% 38.1%
21 1993 46/56 10.3 4.3 60.2% 81.1% 50.7% 57.7% 47.2% 69.1% 37.8% 1994 4/5 3.0 4.0 58.1% 73.3% 37.5% 40.8% 32.0% 58.1% 38.2%
22 1994 42/45 11.7 4.0 55.0% 81.2% 50.6% 70.8% 47.6% 67.7% 38.1% 1995 11/12 2.9 3.8 61.2% 64.3% 45.8% 55.8% 32.3% 57.2% 32.9%
23 1995 54/60 11.5 3.1 59.0% 79.1% 51.2% 70.1% 41.8% 67.7% 36.1% 1996 16/24 4.2 3.7 61.2% 68.8% 47.3% 55.1% 40.0% 60.6% 38.4%
24 1996 61/70 12.8 3.4 58.1% 82.1% 49.2% 60.1% 41.1% 68.2% 37.3% 1997 25/31 3.6 3.8 61.6% 74.3% 49.6% 58.7% 39.3% 64.9% 36.6%
25 1997 61/69 14.3 3.1 57.8% 85.0% 53.3% 65.0% 43.2% 71.7% 37.3% 1998 20/23 4.1 2.9 58.7% 71.2% 53.2% 70.8% 45.8% 63.8% 38.1%
26 1998 50/61 14.9 3.4 59.8% 82.3% 53.6% 57.2% 44.1% 70.7% 36.9% 1999 10/12 3.4 4.4 56.2% 71.4% 50.7% 61.7% 31.5% 62.2% 33.4%
27 1999 47/62 13.4 2.8 61.1% 82.0% 52.2% 64.0% 43.5% 70.4% 37.8% 2000 7/9 4.0 4.3 61.1% 65.9% 46.3% 44.5% 26.8% 58.0% 29.9%
28 2000 35/41 14.9 3.4 58.6% 82.2% 55.1% 59.5% 35.2% 71.0% 36.7% 2001 3/3 8.7 7.3 58.3% 70.9% 42.7% 53.6% 31.8% 59.1% 30.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 1/1 5.0 1.0 55.0% 54.5% 55.6% 20.0% — 55.0% 28.3%
30 2002 12/13 15.7 6.6 53.3% 81.8% 49.0% 67.7% 43.4% 66.1% 34.1% 2003 1/1 0.0 8.0 58.4% 61.0% 50.0% 66.7% 42.9% 56.4% 37.6%
31 2003 21/21 12.9 5.4 52.1% 79.9% 48.0% 67.4% 45.6% 64.4% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 2.0 0.0 60.0% 66.7% 41.7% 42.9% 66.7% 56.7% 27.6%
Career — 530/615 12.5 3.6 58.0% 81.2% 51.9% 63.2% 43.0% 68.9% 37.2% — 106/130 3.8 3.8 60.2% 70.2% 48.7% 58.3% 37.5% 61.7% 35.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Krajicek Leander Paes
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1493 103.0 -1.66 +0.58 0.932 49.1% +36 — — 28.6% -0.43 1–0 0–1 — +0.26
19 1991 1746 141.4 +4.23 -0.01 1.092 51.2% -23 -142 -131 56.0% +0.54 9–9 (50%) 10–12 (45%) 101.8 -1.45 1992 1486 102.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.04
20 1992 1949 161.3 +6.70 +1.48 1.220 53.2% +15 -266 -275 63.5% +0.94 14–9 (61%) 18–17 (51%) 104.9 -1.66 1993 1483 104.5 -0.63 +0.03 0.998 49.6% +25 — — 36.4% -0.18 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.15
21 1993 1885 155.4 +6.73 +0.19 1.222 53.3% -30 +5 -123 60.6% +0.72 11–8 (58%) 14–15 (48%) 98.9 -1.17 1994 1496 104.2 -1.44 -1.83 0.912 47.8% +3 — — 41.7% -0.92 0–1 2–0 — +0.34
22 1994 1883 152.7 +5.16 +0.47 1.178 52.9% -19 +63 -64 69.4% +1.08 2–6 (25%) 12–12 (50%) 93.0 +0.23 1995 1486 109.8 -2.61 -2.49 0.768 45.6% +14 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.3 +0.09
23 1995 1835 148.6 +4.66 -0.97 1.118 51.8% +66 +23 -81 64.6% +0.80 11–8 (58%) 16–15 (52%) 98.8 +1.78 1996 1655 129.5 -1.01 -0.14 0.975 49.4% -32 — -11 50.0% -0.11 4–1 (80%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.13
24 1996 1879 156.6 +5.72 +0.26 1.174 52.7% -76 +74 +133 64.5% +0.84 11–4 (73%) 22–16 (58%) 108.1 +0.05 1997 1634 115.9 +1.36 -1.27 1.044 50.5% -37 -94 +43 43.0% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 4–9 (31%) 96.3 +1.81
25 1997 1958 153.7 +8.64 +0.43 1.320 54.0% -8 -40 +49 69.5% +1.20 8–6 (57%) 20–22 (48%) 98.1 -0.46 1998 1660 131.9 +0.72 +0.24 1.053 51.4% -30 — +69 51.0% +0.26 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.3 +1.30
26 1998 1984 154.9 +7.61 +0.20 1.259 53.5% -7 -50 +57 69.1% +1.13 17–6 (74%) 24–12 (67%) 107.8 +0.64 1999 1562 108.9 -1.02 -2.19 0.884 47.9% -19 — +132 25.0% -1.18 1–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.75
27 1999 1881 155.6 +6.78 +0.75 1.279 53.6% +61 -29 +52 66.0% +1.16 5–7 (42%) 12–15 (44%) 89.7 +0.83 2000 1538 104.1 -1.46 -3.99 0.711 44.3% +15 — — 36.4% -1.23 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.88
28 2000 1880 150.8 +7.72 -0.11 1.266 53.1% +52 -32 +50 61.1% +0.86 5–4 (56%) 8–12 (40%) 94.8 -1.68 2001 1596 106.9 -0.83 -2.86 0.736 45.8% — — — 33.3% -0.67 — 0–1 — +0.48
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1579 97.0 -2.95 -4.40 0.628 40.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12
30 2002 1837 125.9 +3.14 -0.36 1.008 50.0% +25 — +75 59.5% +0.32 2–3 (40%) 5–3 (63%) 98.6 -0.73 2003 1572 104.5 +2.28 -1.66 0.864 47.8% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.16
31 2003 1762 123.4 +1.62 -1.25 0.973 49.6% +3 +73 +168 48.1% +0.06 5–2 (71%) 5–8 (38%) 98.1 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1551 95.8 -1.30 -1.39 0.637 42.4% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.29
Career — 2049 158.4 +6.18 +0.22 1.195 52.8% +5 -20 +4 63.9% +0.89 100–72 (58%) 166–159 (51%) 99.5 -0.67 — 1738 121.9 -0.33 -1.21 0.934 48.8% -15 -94 +47 40.3% -0.54 14–15 (48%) 20–31 (39%) 96.9 +4.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.