H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Richard Krajicek vs Luke Jensen H2H: 1-0
Richard Krajicek holds a 1–0 lead over Luke Jensen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richard Krajicek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 1996 New Haven third round 6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1996* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Richard Krajicek | 6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(2) | Luke Jensen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Luke Jensen | #962 | #168 | 114 | 1,540 | 12 | 43 | 21.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Krajicek | Luke Jensen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #247 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #402 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #271 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #493 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #762 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #359 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #335 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #519 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #957 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |