H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richard Krajicek vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 4-1

Richard Krajicek holds a 4–1 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1994 Los Angeles semifinal 6-3 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Krajicek
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 6, 1994* Los Angeles ATP 250 SF Hard Mark Woodforde #53 6-3 3-6 6-3 Richard Krajicek #25 Match data
Nov 15, 1992* Antwerp ATP 250 F Carpet Richard Krajicek #13 6-2 6-2 Mark Woodforde #61 Match data
Oct 15, 1992* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 R32 Carpet Richard Krajicek #14 6-4 6-2 Mark Woodforde #50 Match data
Sep 6, 1992* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Richard Krajicek #15 6-1 6-3 6-2 Mark Woodforde #48 Match data
Aug 9, 1992* Los Angeles ATP 250 F Hard Richard Krajicek #15 6-4 2-6 6-4 Mark Woodforde #91 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,044 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 0 14 17
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,922 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Krajicek Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,745 0 1 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,950 0 3 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,546 0 1
21 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,888 0 4 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,883 0 7 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,800 0 2
23 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,832 0 9 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,710 0 3
24 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,876 1 10 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,716 0 3
25 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,969 1 13 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,631 0 3
26 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,975 1 15 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,814 0 3
27 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,879 1 17 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,885 1 17 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,760 0 4
30 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,839 1 17 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,800 0 4
31 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,762 1 17 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,731 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,611 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,584 0 4