H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Richard Krajicek vs Mikael Tillstrom H2H: 1-2
Mikael Tillstrom holds a 2–1 lead over Richard Krajicek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Mikael Tillstrom leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 2000 Barcelona second round 7-6(7) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2000* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Richard Krajicek | 7-6(7) 7-6(4) | Mikael Tillstrom | Match data |
| Nov 10, 1995* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mikael Tillstrom | 7-6(7) 2-6 6-3 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
| May 29, 1994* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Mikael Tillstrom | 7-6(4) 6-2 6-3 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Mikael Tillstrom | #506 | #39 | 966 | 1,831 | 107 | 108 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Krajicek | Mikael Tillstrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #141 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #149 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #116 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 | 1996 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #47 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #85 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #79 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 | 2000 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #80 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |