H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Richard Krajicek vs Nicolas Escude H2H: 1-2
Nicolas Escude holds a 2–1 lead over Richard Krajicek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Escude leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Richard Krajicek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Escude won the 2003 Rotterdam fourth round 6-3 6-7(1) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2003* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Nicolas Escude | 6-3 6-7(1) 7-6(4) | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Nicolas Escude | 2-6 6-3 6-1 6-3 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
| May 14, 1998* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Richard Krajicek | 6-3 6-3 | Nicolas Escude | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,909 | 157 | 124 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Krajicek | Nicolas Escude | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |