H2H data updated: 2026-07-21 07:16 UTC
Richard Krajicek vs Paradorn Srichaphan H2H: 1-0
Richard Krajicek holds a 1–0 lead over Paradorn Srichaphan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richard Krajicek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 2002 Wimbledon third round 7-6(5) 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
THA
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Richard Krajicek | 7-6(5) 6-4 6-2 | Paradorn Srichaphan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Paradorn Srichaphan | #1,149 | #9 | 1,925 | 1,997 | 219 | 182 | 54.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Krajicek | Paradorn Srichaphan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #460 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #99 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 | 2003 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,823 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 | 2004 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 | 2005 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #42 | 1,794 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 | 2006 | 28–31 | 47.5% | #53 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #628 | 1,636 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |