H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Richard Krajicek vs Patrick Rafter H2H: 7-2

Richard Krajicek holds a 7–2 lead over Patrick Rafter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 2000 Halle fourth round 6-7(4) 7-6(5) 6-2.

NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
7 2
9 main draw meetings
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 16, 2000* Halle ATP 250 R16 Grass Richard Krajicek #32 6-7(4) 7-6(5) 6-2 Patrick Rafter #23 Match data
Aug 10, 1998* Canada Masters Masters 1000 F Hard Patrick Rafter #3 7-6(3) 6-4 Richard Krajicek #8 Match data
Nov 1, 1997* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Richard Krajicek #11 7-5 6-2 Patrick Rafter #3 Match data
Jun 1, 1997* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Patrick Rafter #25 6-3 4-6 6-4 6-2 Richard Krajicek #6 Match data
Apr 19, 1997* Tokyo ATP 250 SF Hard Richard Krajicek #6 7-6(5) 6-3 Patrick Rafter #39 Match data
Oct 4, 1996* Singapore ATP 250 R16 Carpet Richard Krajicek #8 6-4 6-2 Patrick Rafter #56 Match data
Aug 16, 1996* New Haven ATP 250 R16 Hard Richard Krajicek #8 6-4 5-7 7-5 Patrick Rafter #72 Match data
Jan 7, 1995* Adelaide ATP 250 QF Hard Richard Krajicek #17 6-4 7-6(4) Patrick Rafter #20 Match data
Oct 8, 1994* Sydney Indoor ATP 250 SF Hard Richard Krajicek #32 6-1 7-6(3) Patrick Rafter #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,044 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 0 14 17
Patrick Rafter #224 #1 3,673 2,104 332 177 65.2% 2 2 0 0 7 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Krajicek Patrick Rafter
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1991 0–1 0.0% #293 1,495 0 0
19 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,745 0 1 1992 0–3 0.0% #243 1,456 0 0
20 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,950 0 3 1993 11–11 50.0% #66 1,619 0 0
21 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,888 0 4 1994 43–26 62.3% #20 1,803 0 1
22 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,883 0 7 1995 29–23 55.8% #66 1,777 0 1
23 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,832 0 9 1996 25–20 55.6% #62 1,761 0 1
24 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,876 1 10 1997 63–26 70.8% #2 2,035 1 2
25 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,969 1 13 1998 58–20 74.4% #4 2,010 2 8
26 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,975 1 15 1999 31–16 66.0% #16 1,933 2 9
27 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,879 1 17 2000 30–16 65.2% #15 1,889 2 10
28 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,885 1 17 2001 42–15 73.7% #7 1,989 2 11
30 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,839 1 17
31 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,762 1 17