H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Richard Krajicek vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 1-0
Richard Krajicek holds a 1–0 lead over Radek Stepanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richard Krajicek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 2003 Milan fourth round 3-6 6-3 7-6(13).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2003* | Milan | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Richard Krajicek | 3-6 6-3 7-6(13) | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Krajicek | Radek Stepanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 | 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 | 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 | 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 | 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 |