H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Richard Krajicek vs Renzo Furlan H2H: 3-0
Richard Krajicek holds a 3–0 lead over Renzo Furlan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 1995 Tokyo Indoor fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 1995* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Richard Krajicek | 6-3 6-2 | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
| Nov 3, 1994* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Richard Krajicek | 6-3 6-3 | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
| May 5, 1994* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Richard Krajicek | 6-3 7-6(7) | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Renzo Furlan | #1,479 | #19 | 1,235 | 1,844 | 209 | 231 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Krajicek | Renzo Furlan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #222 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #77 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1993 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 | 1994 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #41 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 | 1995 | 37–31 | 54.4% | #29 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 | 1996 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #40 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #144 | 1,514 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #225 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #236 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,540 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #194 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |