H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Richard Krajicek vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 2-2
Richard Krajicek and Thomas Johansson are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 2–1 on carpet, while Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 1999 London semifinal 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1999* | London | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Richard Krajicek | 6-2 6-4 | Thomas Johansson | Match data |
| Sep 6, 1998* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-7(5) 5-4 (ret.) | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
| Feb 14, 1998* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Richard Krajicek | 6-4 6-4 | Thomas Johansson | Match data |
| Oct 5, 1996* | Singapore | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Thomas Johansson | 5-7 7-6(3) (ret.) | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Thomas Johansson | #586 | #7 | 2,365 | 1,969 | 336 | 277 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Krajicek | Thomas Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #422 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #117 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 | 2000 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #39 | 1,825 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 | 2001 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 | 2002 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #14 | 1,746 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #30 | 1,855 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,892 | 1 | 9 |
| 31 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #71 | 1,723 | 1 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,759 | 1 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #136 | 1,673 | 1 | 9 |