H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Richard Krajicek vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 3-1
Richard Krajicek holds a 3–1 lead over Todd Woodbridge in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Richard Krajicek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 1999 Wimbledon second round 7-5 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Richard Krajicek | 7-5 6-4 6-4 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
| Jun 2, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Richard Krajicek | 7-5 6-2 6-2 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
| Apr 13, 1996* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Todd Woodbridge | 6-4 7-6(5) | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
| Aug 19, 1993* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Richard Krajicek | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Krajicek | Todd Woodbridge | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |