H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Richard Lewis vs Onny Parun H2H: 1-1
Richard Lewis and Onny Parun are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Onny Parun leads 1–0 on carpet, while Richard Lewis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Lewis won the 1982 Auckland third round 5-7 6-3 12-10.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 71
Left-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 79
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1982* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Richard Lewis | 5-7 6-3 12-10 | Onny Parun | Match data |
| Nov 21, 1972* | London | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Onny Parun | 7-6 6-4 | Richard Lewis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Lewis | #766 | #77 | 0 | 1,669 | 67 | 115 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Onny Parun | #398 | #18 | 0 | 1,990 | 375 | 342 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Lewis | Onny Parun | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1973 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #205 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1974 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #249 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1975 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #197 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1976 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #166 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1977 | 27–29 | 48.2% | #77 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 13–22 | 37.1% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1978 | 3–17 | 15.0% | #258 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1979 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #108 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1980 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #245 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 39–36 | 52.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1981 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 49–43 | 53.3% | #40 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #93 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 76–37 | 67.3% | #25 | 1,945 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 65–31 | 67.7% | #26 | 1,889 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #29 | 1,816 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #149 | 1,624 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1–14 | 6.7% | #210 | 1,499 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #214 | 1,426 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #96 | 1,595 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #99 | 1,535 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 |