H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Richard Lewis vs Patrick Proisy H2H: 1-1
Richard Lewis and Patrick Proisy are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patrick Proisy leads 1–0 on carpet, while Richard Lewis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Patrick Proisy won the 1980 Republic of China third round 6-7 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 71
Left-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 76
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1980* | Republic of China | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Patrick Proisy | 6-7 6-1 6-2 | Richard Lewis | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1976* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Richard Lewis | 6-4 2-6 6-2 1-6 8-6 | Patrick Proisy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Lewis | #766 | #77 | 0 | 1,669 | 67 | 115 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patrick Proisy | #232 | #23 | 0 | 1,876 | 220 | 193 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Lewis | Patrick Proisy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1973 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #205 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1974 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #249 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1975 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #197 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1976 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #166 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 27–18 | 60.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1977 | 27–29 | 48.2% | #77 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 36–21 | 63.2% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1978 | 3–17 | 15.0% | #258 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #41 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1979 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #108 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #69 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1980 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #245 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1981 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #104 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #93 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #93 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #158 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |