H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Richard Matuszewski vs Danie Visser H2H: 0-1

Danie Visser holds a 1–0 lead over Richard Matuszewski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danie Visser leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Danie Visser won the 1988 San Francisco round of 16 6-1 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richard Matuszewski
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Danie Visser
RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Danie Visser #231 6-1 7-6 Richard Matuszewski #166 Match data Sep 30, 1988* R16 San Francisco ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richard Matuszewski #839 #49 405 1,693 54 80 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richard Matuszewski Danie Visser
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1981 1–2 33.3% — 1,506 0 0
20 1985 1–1 50.0% #362 1,516 0 0 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0
21 1986 6–3 66.7% #90 1,609 0 0 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0
22 1987 8–16 33.3% #197 1,574 0 0 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0
23 1988 11–10 52.4% #56 1,654 0 0 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0
24 1989 16–22 42.1% #119 1,614 0 0 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0
25 1990 4–9 30.8% #219 1,550 0 0 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0
26 1991 0–1 0.0% #263 1,537 0 0 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0
27 1992 2–2 50.0% #144 1,534 0 0 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0
28 1993 5–9 35.7% #143 1,572 0 0 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0
29 1994 1–6 14.3% #307 1,514 0 0 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0
30 1995 0–1 0.0% #835 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richard Matuszewski Danie Visser
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1986 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1987 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
23 1988 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1989 9 13 22 40.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1990 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1992 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
28 1993 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34 48 82 41.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 15 24 37.5% 10 14 24 41.7% — 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 23/27 of Richard Matuszewski's and 3/3 of Danie Visser's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richard Matuszewski Danie Visser
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 1991 1/1 6.0 4.0 67.2% 74.4% 33.3% 50.0% 28.6% 60.9% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 3/4 4.3 3.0 66.1% 72.7% 55.7% 85.7% 50.5% 67.3% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 11/14 4.7 3.3 62.7% 66.7% 45.1% 56.9% 28.3% 58.6% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 7/7 2.4 3.0 61.6% 65.1% 50.1% 59.4% 22.7% 59.6% 31.3% 1991 3/3 7.3 1.3 63.8% 64.9% 49.3% 70.2% 8.3% 59.1% 26.6%
30 1995 1/1 8.0 0.0 65.1% 75.9% 41.4% 40.0% 25.0% 63.9% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 23/134 4.2 3.0 63.1% 67.7% 47.4% 60.4% 29.3% 60.4% 33.7% — 3/221 7.3 1.3 63.8% 64.9% 49.3% 70.2% 8.3% 59.1% 26.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richard Matuszewski Danie Visser
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1507 107.7 — — — — +43 — — 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 — +0.01
20 1985 1517 104.7 — — — — — — — 37.5% -0.25 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.17 1982 1483 114.0 — — — — +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) — +1.20
21 1986 1610 127.3 — — — — +30 — — 70.0% +1.50 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.35 1983 1496 111.4 — — — — +39 -38 — 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.59
22 1987 1574 128.9 — — — — +55 — -108 36.8% -0.61 1–4 (20%) 2–7 (22%) — -0.01 1984 1618 134.7 — — — — -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.82
23 1988 1654 131.2 — — — — +37 — — 55.1% -0.12 1–5 (17%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.65 1985 1643 120.9 — — — — -82 — +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.53
24 1989 1615 133.3 — — — — +8 — -52 44.2% -0.65 4–8 (33%) 10–5 (67%) — +0.01 1986 1676 124.7 — — — — -64 — +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.55
25 1990 1550 110.5 — — — — +33 — — 38.2% -0.79 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.40 1987 1635 124.7 — — — — -10 — +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) — -1.15
26 1991 1538 99.7 -2.32 +1.73 0.951 48.5% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.01 1988 1591 112.9 — — — — -2 — +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) — +1.16
27 1992 1534 107.8 +1.69 -0.95 1.293 54.9% +31 — — 45.5% +0.64 1–0 0–2 — +0.73 1989 1621 129.7 — — — — -23 — +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.79
28 1993 1573 117.1 -1.91 -2.69 0.777 46.8% -39 — +73 40.0% -0.57 1–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.22 1990 1652 113.0 — — — — -22 — -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.54
29 1994 1514 98.6 -2.62 -2.16 0.775 46.2% -41 — +119 18.8% -1.44 1–1 0–2 — +0.49 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.02
30 1995 1502 102.4 -3.20 -0.60 1.057 50.6% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1694 131.8 -1.73 -2.02 0.851 47.9% +21 — -5 43.3% -0.43 13–26 (33%) 25–33 (43%) 91.0 +2.31 — 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.