H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Richard Russell vs Mark Cox H2H: 0-2
Mark Cox holds a 2–0 lead over Richard Russell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Cox leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Cox won the 1969 San Juan third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JAM
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1969* | San Juan | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mark Cox | 6-3 6-4 | Richard Russell | Match data |
| Mar 7, 1968* | Barranquilla | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Mark Cox | 6-1 6-1 | Richard Russell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Russell | #755 | #140 | 40 | 1,575 | 56 | 100 | 35.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richard Russell | Mark Cox | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 6–20 | 23.1% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1971 | 12–24 | 33.3% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1972 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1973 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #191 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1974 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #249 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1975 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 |