H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Richey Reneberg vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 1-1
Richey Reneberg and Andrei Olhovskiy are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrei Olhovskiy leads 1–0 on carpet, while Richey Reneberg leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Richey Reneberg won the 1995 Rosmalen fourth round 3-6 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 1995* | Rosmalen | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Richey Reneberg | 3-6 6-1 6-1 | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
| Oct 13, 1994* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andrei Olhovskiy | 6-7(5) 7-5 7-5 | Richey Reneberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richey Reneberg | #867 | #20 | 1,333 | 1,923 | 305 | 261 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Andrei Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,750 | 113 | 162 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richey Reneberg | Andrei Olhovskiy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #337 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1987 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #79 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #128 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #27 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #34 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1995 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,682 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,470 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #202 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #573 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |