H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richey Reneberg vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 1-4

Cedric Pioline holds a 4–1 lead over Richey Reneberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1997 Stockholm third round 6-4 6-4.

USA Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 6, 1997* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Cedric Pioline #23 6-4 6-4 Richey Reneberg #60 Match data
May 31, 1996* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Cedric Pioline #19 7-5 6-2 6-3 Richey Reneberg #32 Match data
Aug 15, 1994 Indianapolis ATP 250 R32 Hard Richey Reneberg #64 6-2 6-2 Cedric Pioline #16 Match data
Nov 13, 1992* Moscow ATP 250 R16 Carpet Cedric Pioline #37 4-6 6-0 7-6(1) Richey Reneberg #99 Match data
Oct 24, 1992* Lyon ATP 250 SF Carpet Cedric Pioline #46 6-2 6-7(1) 7-5 Richey Reneberg #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richey Reneberg #867 #20 1,333 1,923 305 261 53.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richey Reneberg Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1986 2–3 40.0% #337 1,512 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1987 15–13 53.6% #79 1,671 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1988 14–19 42.4% #128 1,675 0 0 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1989 23–21 52.3% #80 1,689 0 0 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1990 37–25 59.7% #23 1,821 0 0 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1991 32–18 64.0% #27 1,805 0 1 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1992 18–20 47.4% #95 1,712 0 1 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1993 37–26 58.7% #30 1,755 0 2 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 1994 33–24 57.9% #34 1,809 0 2 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 1995 22–23 48.9% #57 1,773 0 2 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 1996 37–24 60.7% #32 1,815 0 3 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 1997 18–20 47.4% #73 1,682 0 3 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 1998 10–15 40.0% #154 1,596 0 3 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 1999 6–9 40.0% #202 1,626 0 3 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5
34 2000 1–1 50.0% #573 1,631 0 3