H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richey Reneberg vs David Pate H2H: 3-2

Richey Reneberg holds a 3–2 lead over David Pate in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Richey Reneberg leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Richey Reneberg won the 1991 Chicago fourth round 6-3 7-6(2).

USA Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 1, 1991* Chicago ATP 250 R16 Carpet Richey Reneberg #35 6-3 7-6(2) David Pate #84 Match data
Oct 4, 1990* Sydney Indoor ATP 250 R32 Hard Richey Reneberg #31 6-2 6-3 David Pate #115 Match data
Nov 17, 1989* Johannesburg ATP 250 R16 Hard David Pate #216 6-4 6-2 Richey Reneberg #88 Match data
Aug 10, 1989* Indianapolis ATP 250 R32 Hard David Pate #145 6-4 3-6 6-2 Richey Reneberg #86 Match data
Mar 15, 1988* Key Biscayne Masters 1000 R128 Hard Richey Reneberg #83 6-4 7-5 6-4 David Pate #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richey Reneberg #867 #20 1,333 1,923 305 261 53.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
David Pate #911 #18 441 1,874 181 168 51.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richey Reneberg David Pate
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1981 0–1 0.0% 1,493 0 0
20 1986 2–3 40.0% #337 1,512 0 0 1982 2–5 28.6% 1,484 0 0
21 1987 15–13 53.6% #79 1,671 0 0 1983 5–7 41.7% #203 1,529 0 0
22 1988 14–19 42.4% #128 1,675 0 0 1984 21–13 61.8% #30 1,743 0 1
23 1989 23–21 52.3% #80 1,689 0 0 1985 31–24 56.4% #26 1,741 0 1
24 1990 37–25 59.7% #23 1,821 0 0 1986 35–23 60.3% #30 1,787 0 1
25 1991 32–18 64.0% #27 1,805 0 1 1987 28–18 60.9% #18 1,751 0 2
26 1992 18–20 47.4% #95 1,712 0 1 1988 20–16 55.6% #47 1,716 0 2
27 1993 37–26 58.7% #30 1,755 0 2 1989 9–19 32.1% #157 1,656 0 2
28 1994 33–24 57.9% #34 1,809 0 2 1990 16–15 51.6% #94 1,657 0 2
29 1995 22–23 48.9% #57 1,773 0 2 1991 11–18 37.9% #160 1,595 0 2
30 1996 37–24 60.7% #32 1,815 0 3 1992 1–4 20.0% #396 1,572 0 2
31 1997 18–20 47.4% #73 1,682 0 3 1993 1–3 25.0% #514 1,547 0 2
32 1998 10–15 40.0% #154 1,596 0 3 1994 1–1 50.0% #624 1,560 0 2
33 1999 6–9 40.0% #202 1,626 0 3 1995 0–1 0.0% #911 1,541 0 2
34 2000 1–1 50.0% #573 1,631 0 3