H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Richey Reneberg vs David Rikl H2H: 2-0

Richey Reneberg holds a 2–0 lead over David Rikl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Richey Reneberg leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richey Reneberg won the 1996 Memphis round of 64 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richey Reneberg
USA Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
David Rikl
CZE Age 55 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richey Reneberg #59 6-1 6-2 David Rikl #101 Match data Feb 21, 1996* R64 Memphis Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Richey Reneberg #35 7-6(7) 6-1 5-7 6-3 David Rikl #51 Match data May 27, 1994* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richey Reneberg #867 #20 1,333 1,920 305 262 53.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
David Rikl #852 #41 809 1,687 53 92 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richey Reneberg David Rikl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1989 1–1 50.0% #400 1,503 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #313 1,491 0 0
20 1986 2–3 40.0% #337 1,512 0 0 1991 1–3 25.0% #163 1,474 0 0
21 1987 15–13 53.6% #79 1,671 0 0 1992 5–7 41.7% #151 1,502 0 0
22 1988 14–19 42.4% #128 1,676 0 0 1993 7–13 35.0% #95 1,531 0 0
23 1989 23–21 52.3% #80 1,690 0 0 1994 19–28 40.4% #80 1,536 0 0
24 1990 37–25 59.7% #23 1,821 0 0 1995 7–13 35.0% #83 1,534 0 0
25 1991 32–18 64.0% #27 1,801 0 1 1996 10–21 32.3% #150 1,528 0 0
26 1992 18–20 47.4% #95 1,712 0 1 1997 3–4 42.9% #173 1,578 0 0
27 1993 37–26 58.7% #30 1,756 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 1994 33–24 57.9% #34 1,809 0 2 1999 0–1 0.0% #868 1,564 0 0
29 1995 22–23 48.9% #57 1,775 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1996 37–25 59.7% #32 1,799 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1997 18–20 47.4% #73 1,680 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1998 10–15 40.0% #154 1,595 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1999 6–9 40.0% #202 1,625 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2000 1–1 50.0% #573 1,630 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richey Reneberg David Rikl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1986 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1988 4 8 12 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1993 1 4 5 20.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1989 17 10 27 63.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1994 7 14 21 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1990 20 13 33 60.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1995 0 4 4 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
25 1991 12 8 20 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 7 15 22 31.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1992 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 1993 26 13 39 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 25 13 38 65.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1999 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1995 11 14 25 44.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 18 15 33 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 171 140 311 55.0% 43 43 86 50.0% 39 29 68 57.4% 52 50 102 51.0% — 13 32 45 28.9% 32 46 78 41.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 8 14 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 342/395 of Richey Reneberg's and 129/142 of David Rikl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richey Reneberg David Rikl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 2/4 2.0 4.5 58.4% 69.4% 48.3% 66.3% 33.3% 60.9% 31.4%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 11/12 1.5 3.7 55.8% 61.4% 43.4% 57.2% 40.8% 53.2% 40.0%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 18/20 1.8 3.6 56.0% 64.5% 45.1% 51.7% 47.0% 56.1% 36.7%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 43/47 2.8 3.8 56.8% 64.9% 49.0% 55.1% 40.8% 58.2% 35.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 20/20 3.8 4.4 53.3% 67.9% 49.0% 55.8% 44.4% 59.4% 39.0%
25 1991 44/50 3.7 2.9 58.8% 69.8% 50.2% 57.7% 46.9% 61.5% 40.0% 1996 27/31 2.1 3.3 58.8% 64.2% 45.1% 56.8% 40.0% 56.5% 36.7%
26 1992 35/38 4.0 3.0 56.6% 71.6% 49.4% 58.4% 41.5% 61.9% 37.3% 1997 7/7 5.4 5.9 55.2% 67.9% 44.5% 60.4% 56.0% 57.4% 39.2%
27 1993 57/63 4.2 2.1 54.4% 72.8% 53.8% 57.1% 47.2% 64.1% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 51/57 4.6 2.4 54.5% 71.7% 53.1% 53.9% 45.2% 62.8% 41.3% 1999 1/1 3.0 5.0 53.4% 82.1% 50.0% 33.3% 66.7% 67.1% 34.9%
29 1995 38/45 5.3 3.0 52.5% 71.3% 51.5% 58.0% 36.8% 62.0% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 52/62 4.9 2.5 54.6% 72.9% 53.0% 62.6% 51.7% 63.7% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 29/38 5.2 2.4 55.9% 72.4% 52.2% 58.1% 37.2% 63.5% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 21/25 5.8 3.7 56.8% 69.4% 48.4% 60.7% 38.8% 60.4% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 13/15 6.3 3.3 55.6% 72.8% 47.9% 46.8% 39.5% 61.8% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2000 2/2 2.5 0.5 48.7% 69.0% 50.6% 64.3% 33.3% 59.6% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 342/567 4.6 2.7 55.3% 71.7% 51.7% 57.7% 44.1% 62.7% 39.5% — 129/145 2.7 3.9 56.4% 65.2% 46.9% 55.6% 43.0% 57.4% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richey Reneberg David Rikl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1504 102.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — +0.28
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1492 101.9 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.50 — — — -0.02
20 1986 1512 107.9 — — — — — +15 — 33.3% -0.33 2–0 0–1 — +0.23 1991 1474 99.3 -0.87 -1.37 0.804 47.8% +55 — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 — — +0.56
21 1987 1672 145.5 — — — — -22 -111 -30 54.2% +0.40 2–4 (33%) 6–10 (38%) — -1.09 1992 1503 110.9 -3.14 -0.80 0.856 47.2% — +80 — 41.4% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.71
22 1988 1677 138.5 — — — — -20 -76 -41 45.5% -0.19 1–5 (17%) 0–5 (0%) — -2.96 1993 1532 121.2 -2.57 -0.92 0.837 46.7% -53 +80 — 37.0% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.11
23 1989 1691 146.0 — — — — +32 -131 -6 52.6% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 8–6 (57%) — -2.41 1994 1536 126.2 -2.08 -2.48 0.847 47.1% -44 +135 — 38.9% -0.83 5–8 (38%) 5–12 (29%) — +0.69
24 1990 1822 152.0 — — — — +35 -278 -123 56.1% +0.54 13–8 (62%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.36 1995 1534 123.3 -1.30 -0.19 0.959 49.3% -48 +102 — 42.0% -0.48 1–5 (17%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.78
25 1991 1801 136.9 +1.06 +1.57 1.040 50.8% +19 -158 -128 56.7% +0.32 16–7 (70%) 18–10 (64%) — +1.77 1996 1529 123.0 -3.53 -0.97 0.843 46.6% -13 +41 — 39.0% -0.89 3–9 (25%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.07
26 1992 1712 137.1 +0.01 -0.27 0.979 49.4% +15 — -40 50.0% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 9–4 (69%) — +0.14 1997 1578 115.2 -1.18 +1.34 0.921 48.9% -56 — +29 50.0% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.27
27 1993 1757 149.2 +1.89 +3.46 1.174 52.9% +20 -183 -68 58.3% +0.77 6–9 (40%) 9–13 (41%) — +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1810 145.9 +1.16 +3.35 1.110 51.8% +16 -205 -128 57.6% +0.59 8–10 (44%) 11–5 (69%) — -0.33 1999 1565 98.3 -0.24 +1.75 1.063 50.0% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.03
29 1995 1775 141.8 +0.54 +0.52 0.988 49.5% +7 -140 -93 49.1% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1800 153.8 +1.89 +2.79 1.110 51.9% -7 -121 +20 55.6% +0.52 14–8 (64%) 12–12 (50%) — -3.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1681 138.4 +1.16 -0.37 0.980 49.5% +6 -19 +159 48.9% -0.08 9–7 (56%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1596 119.7 -1.25 -0.80 0.936 48.8% +52 +19 +180 43.3% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1626 124.0 -0.07 +0.69 1.005 50.3% +16 — +87 44.7% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2000 1630 106.1 0.00 -0.50 1.009 50.3% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1920 150.0 +0.99 +1.68 1.057 50.9% +15 -127 -13 52.9% +0.28 92–89 (51%) 107–97 (52%) 102.3 -1.95 — 1687 125.9 -2.34 -1.19 0.867 47.4% -37 +85 +29 39.5% -0.81 15–30 (33%) 19–25 (43%) 91.8 +2.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.