H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richey Reneberg vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 2-2

Richey Reneberg and Jeff Tarango are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Richey Reneberg won the 1999 Memphis third round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richey Reneberg
USA Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 18, 1999* Memphis ATP 250 R32 Hard Richey Reneberg #181 6-2 6-2 Jeff Tarango #61 Match data
Oct 7, 1994* Sydney Indoor ATP 250 R16 Hard Jeff Tarango #85 7-5 6-4 Richey Reneberg #38 Match data
Jan 15, 1993* Jakarta ATP 250 R16 Hard Richey Reneberg #69 6-2 7-6(2) Jeff Tarango #61 Match data
Feb 7, 1992* San Francisco ATP 250 R16 Hard Jeff Tarango #61 6-4 7-5 Richey Reneberg #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richey Reneberg #867 #20 1,333 1,923 305 261 53.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richey Reneberg Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1986 2–3 40.0% #337 1,512 0 0 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1987 15–13 53.6% #79 1,671 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1988 14–19 42.4% #128 1,675 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1989 23–21 52.3% #80 1,689 0 0 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1990 37–25 59.7% #23 1,821 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1991 32–18 64.0% #27 1,805 0 1 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1992 18–20 47.4% #95 1,712 0 1 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1993 37–26 58.7% #30 1,755 0 2 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 1994 33–24 57.9% #34 1,809 0 2 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 1995 22–23 48.9% #57 1,773 0 2 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 1996 37–24 60.7% #32 1,815 0 3 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 1997 18–20 47.4% #73 1,682 0 3 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 1998 10–15 40.0% #154 1,596 0 3 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 1999 6–9 40.0% #202 1,626 0 3 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2
34 2000 1–1 50.0% #573 1,631 0 3 — — — — — — —