H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Richey Reneberg vs Jim Grabb H2H: 2-1
Richey Reneberg holds a 2–1 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Richey Reneberg leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richey Reneberg won the 1995 Roland Garros first round 6-4 5-7 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Richey Reneberg | 6-4 5-7 6-2 6-3 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1991* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jim Grabb | 6-7(3) 6-2 7-5 | Richey Reneberg | Match data |
| Feb 22, 1989* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Richey Reneberg | 6-3 3-6 7-6 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richey Reneberg | #867 | #20 | 1,333 | 1,923 | 305 | 261 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richey Reneberg | Jim Grabb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #337 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1987 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #79 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #128 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #27 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #34 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1995 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,682 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #202 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #573 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |