H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Richey Reneberg vs Jimmy Connors H2H: 1-0

Richey Reneberg holds a 1–0 lead over Jimmy Connors in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richey Reneberg leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Richey Reneberg won the 1996 Atlanta third round 6-2 3-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richey Reneberg
USA Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jimmy Connors
USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 2, 1996* Atlanta ATP 250 R32 Clay Richey Reneberg #37 6-2 3-6 6-1 Jimmy Connors #413 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richey Reneberg #867 #20 1,333 1,923 305 261 53.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,410 1,262 294 81.1% 8 1 1 0 99 109

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richey Reneberg Jimmy Connors
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,769 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,991 0 6
20 1986 2–3 40.0% #337 1,512 0 0 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,152 0 17
21 1987 15–13 53.6% #79 1,671 0 0 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,301 3 32
22 1988 14–19 42.4% #128 1,675 0 0 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,260 3 41
23 1989 23–21 52.3% #80 1,689 0 0 1976 97–8 92.4% #1 2,370 4 53
24 1990 37–25 59.7% #23 1,821 0 0 1977 69–15 82.1% #1 2,271 4 61
25 1991 32–18 64.0% #27 1,805 0 1 1978 67–6 91.8% #1 2,326 5 71
26 1992 18–20 47.4% #95 1,712 0 1 1979 78–12 86.7% #2 2,272 5 79
27 1993 37–26 58.7% #30 1,755 0 2 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,197 5 85
28 1994 33–24 57.9% #34 1,809 0 2 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,162 5 89
29 1995 22–23 48.9% #57 1,773 0 2 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,263 7 96
30 1996 37–24 60.7% #32 1,815 0 3 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,193 8 100
31 1997 18–20 47.4% #73 1,682 0 3 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,240 8 105
32 1998 10–15 40.0% #154 1,596 0 3 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,133 8 105
33 1999 6–9 40.0% #202 1,626 0 3 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,013 8 105
34 2000 1–1 50.0% #573 1,631 0 3 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,985 8 105
35 — — — — — — — 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,020 8 107
36 — — — — — — — 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,957 8 109
37 — — — — — — — 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,881 8 109
38 — — — — — — — 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,887 8 109
39 — — — — — — — 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,774 8 109
40 — — — — — — — 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,717 8 109
41 — — — — — — — 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,681 8 109
42 — — — — — — — 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,673 8 109
43 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,665 8 109