H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Richey Reneberg vs John Fitzgerald H2H: 1-0
Richey Reneberg holds a 1–0 lead over John Fitzgerald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richey Reneberg leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Richey Reneberg won the 1990 Moscow third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 65
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1990* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Richey Reneberg | 7-5 6-2 | John Fitzgerald | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richey Reneberg | #867 | #20 | 1,333 | 1,923 | 305 | 261 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| John Fitzgerald | #765 | #25 | 321 | 1,857 | 230 | 221 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richey Reneberg | John Fitzgerald | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #305 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #337 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #60 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #79 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #128 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #43 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1989 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1990 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #91 | 1,665 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1991 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #27 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,654 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1992 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,778 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1994 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #34 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1995 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #188 | 1,587 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #205 | 1,610 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,682 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #166 | 1,618 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #298 | 1,582 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #202 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,575 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #573 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 |