H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Richey Reneberg vs John Van Lottum H2H: 0-1

John Van Lottum holds a 1–0 lead over Richey Reneberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, John Van Lottum leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Van Lottum won the 1997 US Open round of 128 6-1 6-4 2-6 6-4.

USA Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
NED Age 50 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Van Lottum 6-1 6-4 2-6 6-4 Richey Reneberg #59 Match data Aug 27, 1997* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richey Reneberg #867 #20 1,333 1,920 305 262 53.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
John Van Lottum 1,719 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richey Reneberg John Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1986 2–3 40.0% #337 1,512 0 0
21 1987 15–13 53.6% #79 1,671 0 0
22 1988 14–19 42.4% #128 1,676 0 0
23 1989 23–21 52.3% #80 1,690 0 0
24 1990 37–25 59.7% #23 1,821 0 0
25 1991 32–18 64.0% #27 1,801 0 1
26 1992 18–20 47.4% #95 1,712 0 1
27 1993 37–26 58.7% #30 1,756 0 2
28 1994 33–24 57.9% #34 1,809 0 2
29 1995 22–23 48.9% #57 1,775 0 2
30 1996 37–25 59.7% #32 1,799 0 3
31 1997 18–20 47.4% #73 1,680 0 3
32 1998 10–15 40.0% #154 1,595 0 3
33 1999 6–9 40.0% #202 1,625 0 3
34 2000 1–1 50.0% #573 1,630 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richey Reneberg John Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1988 4 8 12 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1989 17 10 27 63.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1999 17 13 30 56.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1990 20 13 33 60.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1991 12 8 20 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1992 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 1993 26 13 39 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1994 25 13 38 65.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2004 2 6 8 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 1995 11 14 25 44.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 1996 18 15 33 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1997 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
33 1999 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 2000 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 171 140 311 55.0% 43 43 86 50.0% 39 29 68 57.4% 52 50 102 51.0% 30 46 76 39.5% 13 27 40 32.5% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 342/395 of Richey Reneberg's and 41/41 of John Van Lottum's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richey Reneberg John Van Lottum
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 1991 44/50 3.7 2.9 58.8% 69.8% 50.2% 57.7% 46.9% 61.5% 40.0% —/—
26 1992 35/38 4.0 3.0 56.6% 71.6% 49.4% 58.4% 41.5% 61.9% 37.3% —/—
27 1993 57/63 4.2 2.1 54.4% 72.8% 53.8% 57.1% 47.2% 64.1% 42.2% 2003 24/24 3.8 4.0 55.8% 69.8% 48.0% 59.5% 55.2% 60.3% 36.2%
28 1994 51/57 4.6 2.4 54.5% 71.7% 53.1% 53.9% 45.2% 62.8% 41.3% 2004 16/16 3.8 3.1 58.5% 68.9% 49.0% 60.1% 34.7% 60.5% 32.1%
29 1995 38/45 5.3 3.0 52.5% 71.3% 51.5% 58.0% 36.8% 62.0% 37.5% —/—
30 1996 52/62 4.9 2.5 54.6% 72.9% 53.0% 62.6% 51.7% 63.7% 40.3% 2006 1/1 4.0 2.0 51.3% 64.1% 54.1% 66.7% 25.0% 59.2% 30.6%
31 1997 29/38 5.2 2.4 55.9% 72.4% 52.2% 58.1% 37.2% 63.5% 35.8% —/—
32 1998 21/25 5.8 3.7 56.8% 69.4% 48.4% 60.7% 38.8% 60.4% 37.0% —/—
33 1999 13/15 6.3 3.3 55.6% 72.8% 47.9% 46.8% 39.5% 61.8% 38.4% —/—
34 2000 2/2 2.5 0.5 48.7% 69.0% 50.6% 64.3% 33.3% 59.6% 40.8% —/—

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richey Reneberg John Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1986 1512 107.9 +15 33.3% -0.33 2–0 0–1 +0.23 1996 1491 106.9 0.0% -3.75 -0.35
21 1987 1672 145.5 -22 -111 -30 54.2% +0.40 2–4 (33%) 6–10 (38%) 100.4 -1.09 1997 1631 121.6 -56 -46 +18 64.5% +0.77 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.2 -0.05
22 1988 1677 138.5 -20 -76 -41 45.5% -0.19 1–5 (17%) 0–5 (0%) 91.9 -2.96 1998 1612 120.7 -50 -79 +129 40.7% -0.59 5–3 (63%) 3–7 (30%) 101.6 +0.05
23 1989 1691 146.0 +32 -131 -6 52.6% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 8–6 (57%) 99.7 -2.41 1999 1662 128.3 +36 -181 +3 49.1% -0.33 6–6 (50%) 13–3 (81%) 107.6 +1.68
24 1990 1822 152.0 +35 -278 -123 56.1% +0.54 13–8 (62%) 9–9 (50%) 103.8 -0.36 2000 1517 104.0 +57 18.5% -2.33 0–2 0–2 +0.38
25 1991 1801 136.9 +1.06 +1.57 1.040 50.8% +19 -158 -128 56.7% +0.32 16–7 (70%) 18–10 (64%) 108.7 +1.77 2001 1584 111.2 20.0% -2.87 0–1 1–1 -0.48
26 1992 1712 137.1 +0.01 -0.27 0.979 49.4% +15 -40 50.0% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 9–4 (69%) 101.0 +0.14 2002 1624 118.0 -2 -68 50.0% -0.30 0–1 1–1 +0.19
27 1993 1757 149.2 +1.89 +3.46 1.174 52.9% +20 -183 -68 58.3% +0.77 6–9 (40%) 9–13 (41%) 95.4 +0.80 2003 1599 123.9 -1.54 -1.36 0.912 48.4% -3 +14 -27 46.7% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 +0.37
28 1994 1810 145.9 +1.16 +3.35 1.110 51.8% +16 -205 -128 57.6% +0.59 8–10 (44%) 11–5 (69%) 101.8 -0.33 2004 1512 123.3 -1.67 -2.93 0.813 47.0% +60 +41 +27 37.5% -1.07 0–6 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 96.3 -0.92
29 1995 1775 141.8 +0.54 +0.52 0.988 49.5% +7 -140 -93 49.1% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 100.5 -2.47
30 1996 1800 153.8 +1.89 +2.79 1.110 51.9% -7 -121 +20 55.6% +0.52 14–8 (64%) 12–12 (50%) 103.0 -3.44 2006 1511 103.1 +0.34 +3.36 0.751 46.4% 0.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.12
31 1997 1681 138.4 +1.16 -0.37 0.980 49.5% +6 -19 +159 48.9% -0.08 9–7 (56%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -1.18
32 1998 1596 119.7 -1.25 -0.80 0.936 48.8% +52 +19 +180 43.3% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 99.0 +1.17
33 1999 1626 124.0 -0.07 +0.69 1.005 50.3% +16 +87 44.7% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 95.8 -0.78
34 2000 1630 106.1 0.00 -0.50 1.009 50.3% 50.0% -0.50 -0.10
Career 1920 150.0 +0.99 +1.68 1.057 50.9% +15 -127 -13 52.9% +0.28 92–89 (51%) 107–97 (52%) 102.3 -1.95 1719 126.6 -1.54 -1.86 0.869 47.8% +15 -52 +48 43.0% -0.64 15–25 (38%) 27–20 (57%) 100.9 +0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.