H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Richey Reneberg vs Leander Paes H2H: 0-1

Leander Paes holds a 1–0 lead over Richey Reneberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leander Paes leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leander Paes won the 1996 Atlanta Olympics first round 6-7(2) 7-6(7) 1-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richey Reneberg
USA Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Leander Paes
IND Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leander Paes #126 6-7(2) 7-6(7) 1-0 (ret.) Richey Reneberg #20 Match data Jul 26, 1996* R64 Atlanta Olympics Olympics Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richey Reneberg #867 #20 1,333 1,920 305 262 53.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Leander Paes #1,102 #73 611 1,737 53 77 40.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richey Reneberg Leander Paes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1991 1–2 33.3% #278 1,492 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1992 0–1 0.0% #194 1,486 0 0
20 1986 2–3 40.0% #337 1,512 0 0 1993 1–3 25.0% #260 1,483 0 0
21 1987 15–13 53.6% #79 1,671 0 0 1994 2–3 40.0% #139 1,495 0 0
22 1988 14–19 42.4% #128 1,676 0 0 1995 3–9 25.0% #130 1,486 0 0
23 1989 23–21 52.3% #80 1,690 0 0 1996 13–11 54.2% #129 1,654 0 0
24 1990 37–25 59.7% #23 1,821 0 0 1997 13–18 41.9% #122 1,634 0 0
25 1991 32–18 64.0% #27 1,801 0 1 1998 13–10 56.5% #91 1,659 0 1
26 1992 18–20 47.4% #95 1,712 0 1 1999 3–9 25.0% #142 1,562 0 1
27 1993 37–26 58.7% #30 1,756 0 2 2000 3–6 33.3% #188 1,537 0 1
28 1994 33–24 57.9% #34 1,809 0 2 2001 1–2 33.3% #299 1,595 0 1
29 1995 22–23 48.9% #57 1,775 0 2 2002 0–1 0.0% #998 1,579 0 1
30 1996 37–25 59.7% #32 1,799 0 3 2003 0–1 0.0% #1032 1,571 0 1
31 1997 18–20 47.4% #73 1,680 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1998 10–15 40.0% #154 1,595 0 3 2005 0–1 0.0% #1102 1,550 0 1
33 1999 6–9 40.0% #202 1,625 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2000 1–1 50.0% #573 1,630 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richey Reneberg Leander Paes
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1986 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1988 4 8 12 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1995 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1989 17 10 27 63.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1996 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1990 20 13 33 60.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1997 4 11 15 26.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0%
25 1991 12 8 20 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1998 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1992 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 1993 26 13 39 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1994 25 13 38 65.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 1995 11 14 25 44.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 18 15 33 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 171 140 311 55.0% 43 43 86 50.0% 39 29 68 57.4% 52 50 102 51.0% — 25 50 75 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 18 13 31 58.1% 9 10 19 47.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 342/395 of Richey Reneberg's and 106/129 of Leander Paes's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richey Reneberg Leander Paes
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 3/3 3.0 3.7 58.6% 71.0% 47.9% 77.5% 23.3% 61.5% 35.9%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 4/4 3.0 4.8 66.2% 67.5% 51.2% 45.8% 42.6% 61.8% 38.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 4/5 3.0 4.0 58.1% 73.3% 37.5% 40.8% 32.0% 58.1% 38.2%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 11/12 2.9 3.8 61.2% 64.3% 45.8% 55.8% 32.3% 57.2% 32.9%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 16/24 4.2 3.7 61.2% 68.8% 47.3% 55.1% 40.0% 60.6% 38.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 25/31 3.6 3.8 61.6% 74.3% 49.6% 58.7% 39.3% 64.9% 36.6%
25 1991 44/50 3.7 2.9 58.8% 69.8% 50.2% 57.7% 46.9% 61.5% 40.0% 1998 20/23 4.1 2.9 58.7% 71.2% 53.2% 70.8% 45.8% 63.8% 38.1%
26 1992 35/38 4.0 3.0 56.6% 71.6% 49.4% 58.4% 41.5% 61.9% 37.3% 1999 10/12 3.4 4.4 56.2% 71.4% 50.7% 61.7% 31.5% 62.2% 33.4%
27 1993 57/63 4.2 2.1 54.4% 72.8% 53.8% 57.1% 47.2% 64.1% 42.2% 2000 7/9 4.0 4.3 61.1% 65.9% 46.3% 44.5% 26.8% 58.0% 29.9%
28 1994 51/57 4.6 2.4 54.5% 71.7% 53.1% 53.9% 45.2% 62.8% 41.3% 2001 3/3 8.7 7.3 58.3% 70.9% 42.7% 53.6% 31.8% 59.1% 30.1%
29 1995 38/45 5.3 3.0 52.5% 71.3% 51.5% 58.0% 36.8% 62.0% 37.5% 2002 1/1 5.0 1.0 55.0% 54.5% 55.6% 20.0% — 55.0% 28.3%
30 1996 52/62 4.9 2.5 54.6% 72.9% 53.0% 62.6% 51.7% 63.7% 40.3% 2003 1/1 0.0 8.0 58.4% 61.0% 50.0% 66.7% 42.9% 56.4% 37.6%
31 1997 29/38 5.2 2.4 55.9% 72.4% 52.2% 58.1% 37.2% 63.5% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 21/25 5.8 3.7 56.8% 69.4% 48.4% 60.7% 38.8% 60.4% 37.0% 2005 1/1 2.0 0.0 60.0% 66.7% 41.7% 42.9% 66.7% 56.7% 27.6%
33 1999 13/15 6.3 3.3 55.6% 72.8% 47.9% 46.8% 39.5% 61.8% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2000 2/2 2.5 0.5 48.7% 69.0% 50.6% 64.3% 33.3% 59.6% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 342/567 4.6 2.7 55.3% 71.7% 51.7% 57.7% 44.1% 62.7% 39.5% — 106/130 3.8 3.8 60.2% 70.2% 48.7% 58.3% 37.5% 61.7% 35.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richey Reneberg Leander Paes
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1493 103.0 -1.66 +0.58 0.932 49.1% +36 — — 28.6% -0.43 1–0 0–1 — +0.26
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1486 102.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.04
20 1986 1512 107.9 — — — — — +15 — 33.3% -0.33 2–0 0–1 — +0.23 1993 1483 104.5 -0.63 +0.03 0.998 49.6% +25 — — 36.4% -0.18 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.15
21 1987 1672 145.5 — — — — -22 -111 -30 54.2% +0.40 2–4 (33%) 6–10 (38%) 100.4 -1.09 1994 1496 104.2 -1.44 -1.83 0.912 47.8% +3 — — 41.7% -0.92 0–1 2–0 — +0.34
22 1988 1677 138.5 — — — — -20 -76 -41 45.5% -0.19 1–5 (17%) 0–5 (0%) 91.9 -2.96 1995 1486 109.8 -2.61 -2.49 0.768 45.6% +14 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.3 +0.09
23 1989 1691 146.0 — — — — +32 -131 -6 52.6% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 8–6 (57%) 99.7 -2.41 1996 1655 129.5 -1.01 -0.14 0.975 49.4% -32 — -11 50.0% -0.11 4–1 (80%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.13
24 1990 1822 152.0 — — — — +35 -278 -123 56.1% +0.54 13–8 (62%) 9–9 (50%) 103.8 -0.36 1997 1634 115.9 +1.36 -1.27 1.044 50.5% -37 -94 +43 43.0% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 4–9 (31%) 96.3 +1.81
25 1991 1801 136.9 +1.06 +1.57 1.040 50.8% +19 -158 -128 56.7% +0.32 16–7 (70%) 18–10 (64%) 108.7 +1.77 1998 1660 131.9 +0.72 +0.24 1.053 51.4% -30 — +69 51.0% +0.26 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.3 +1.30
26 1992 1712 137.1 +0.01 -0.27 0.979 49.4% +15 — -40 50.0% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 9–4 (69%) 101.0 +0.14 1999 1562 108.9 -1.02 -2.19 0.884 47.9% -19 — +132 25.0% -1.18 1–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.75
27 1993 1757 149.2 +1.89 +3.46 1.174 52.9% +20 -183 -68 58.3% +0.77 6–9 (40%) 9–13 (41%) 95.4 +0.80 2000 1538 104.1 -1.46 -3.99 0.711 44.3% +15 — — 36.4% -1.23 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.88
28 1994 1810 145.9 +1.16 +3.35 1.110 51.8% +16 -205 -128 57.6% +0.59 8–10 (44%) 11–5 (69%) 101.8 -0.33 2001 1596 106.9 -0.83 -2.86 0.736 45.8% — — — 33.3% -0.67 — 0–1 — +0.48
29 1995 1775 141.8 +0.54 +0.52 0.988 49.5% +7 -140 -93 49.1% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 100.5 -2.47 2002 1579 97.0 -2.95 -4.40 0.628 40.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12
30 1996 1800 153.8 +1.89 +2.79 1.110 51.9% -7 -121 +20 55.6% +0.52 14–8 (64%) 12–12 (50%) 103.0 -3.44 2003 1572 104.5 +2.28 -1.66 0.864 47.8% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.16
31 1997 1681 138.4 +1.16 -0.37 0.980 49.5% +6 -19 +159 48.9% -0.08 9–7 (56%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -1.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1596 119.7 -1.25 -0.80 0.936 48.8% +52 +19 +180 43.3% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 99.0 +1.17 2005 1551 95.8 -1.30 -1.39 0.637 42.4% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.29
33 1999 1626 124.0 -0.07 +0.69 1.005 50.3% +16 — +87 44.7% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 95.8 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2000 1630 106.1 0.00 -0.50 1.009 50.3% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1920 150.0 +0.99 +1.68 1.057 50.9% +15 -127 -13 52.9% +0.28 92–89 (51%) 107–97 (52%) 102.3 -1.95 — 1738 121.9 -0.33 -1.21 0.934 48.8% -15 -94 +47 40.3% -0.54 14–15 (48%) 20–31 (39%) 96.9 +4.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.