H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Richey Reneberg vs Leander Paes H2H: 0-1
Leander Paes holds a 1–0 lead over Richey Reneberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leander Paes leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leander Paes won the 1996 Atlanta Olympics second round 6-7(2) 7-6(7) 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1996* | Atlanta Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Leander Paes | 6-7(2) 7-6(7) 1-0 (ret.) | Richey Reneberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richey Reneberg | #867 | #20 | 1,333 | 1,920 | 305 | 262 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Leander Paes | #1,102 | #73 | 611 | 1,737 | 53 | 77 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richey Reneberg | Leander Paes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #337 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #79 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #128 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #80 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #129 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #122 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #27 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #34 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1995 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,775 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1996 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #32 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1032 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #202 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #573 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |