H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Richey Reneberg vs Leonardo Lavalle H2H: 1-0
Richey Reneberg holds a 1–0 lead over Leonardo Lavalle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richey Reneberg leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richey Reneberg won the 1992 Canada Masters third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 1992* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Richey Reneberg | 6-2 6-3 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richey Reneberg | #867 | #20 | 1,333 | 1,923 | 305 | 261 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richey Reneberg | Leonardo Lavalle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #337 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #64 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #79 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #128 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #99 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #27 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #34 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1995 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,682 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #202 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #573 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |