H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Richey Reneberg vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 4-1

Richey Reneberg holds a 4–1 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Richey Reneberg leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1996 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-3 6-3.

USA Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 7, 1996* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Mark Woodforde #31 6-3 6-3 Richey Reneberg #21 Match data
Nov 9, 1995* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Richey Reneberg #74 6-2 7-5 Mark Woodforde #51 Match data
Jun 2, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Richey Reneberg #46 6-0 7-5 7-6(5) Mark Woodforde #32 Match data
Jun 14, 1990* Rosmalen ATP 250 R32 Grass Richey Reneberg #41 6-2 6-4 Mark Woodforde #165 Match data
Jun 15, 1989* Queen's Club ATP 250 R32 Grass Richey Reneberg #113 6-1 6-2 Mark Woodforde #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Richey Reneberg #867 #20 1,333 1,923 305 261 53.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,922 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richey Reneberg Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1986 2–3 40.0% #337 1,512 0 0 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,546 0 1
21 1987 15–13 53.6% #79 1,671 0 0 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1988 14–19 42.4% #128 1,675 0 0 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,800 0 2
23 1989 23–21 52.3% #80 1,689 0 0 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,710 0 3
24 1990 37–25 59.7% #23 1,821 0 0 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,716 0 3
25 1991 32–18 64.0% #27 1,805 0 1 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,631 0 3
26 1992 18–20 47.4% #95 1,712 0 1 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,814 0 3
27 1993 37–26 58.7% #30 1,755 0 2 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 1994 33–24 57.9% #34 1,809 0 2 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 1995 22–23 48.9% #57 1,773 0 2 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,760 0 4
30 1996 37–24 60.7% #32 1,815 0 3 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,800 0 4
31 1997 18–20 47.4% #73 1,682 0 3 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,731 0 4
32 1998 10–15 40.0% #154 1,596 0 3 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 1999 6–9 40.0% #202 1,626 0 3 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,611 0 4
34 2000 1–1 50.0% #573 1,631 0 3 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,584 0 4