H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC
Richey Reneberg holds a 4–0 lead over Martin Damm Sr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Richey Reneberg leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richey Reneberg won the 1997 Long Island round of 32 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richey Reneberg | 6-3 6-2 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data | Aug 21, 1997* | R32 | Long Island | World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Richey Reneberg | 6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 1-6 6-2 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data | Jan 17, 1996* | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Richey Reneberg | 6-2 6-2 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data | Aug 16, 1995* | R64 | Indianapolis | ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
| Richey Reneberg | 6-3 6-4 | Martin Damm Sr | Match data | Jul 20, 1994* | R64 | Washington Open | ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richey Reneberg | #867 | #20 | 1,333 | 1,919 | 305 | 262 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Martin Damm Sr | — | — | — | 1,731 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Richey Reneberg | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #337 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #79 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #128 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #80 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #27 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #34 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,775 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #32 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #202 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #573 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Richey Reneberg | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1986 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1991 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1989 | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1992 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1990 | 20 | 13 | 33 | 60.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 1993 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 1991 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 1994 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
| 1992 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1995 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 1993 | 26 | 13 | 39 | 66.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1996 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% |
| 1994 | 25 | 13 | 38 | 65.8% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1997 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| 1995 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1998 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| 1996 | 18 | 15 | 33 | 54.5% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1999 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1997 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2000 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1998 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2002 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 171 | 140 | 311 | 55.0% | 43 | 43 | 86 | 50.0% | 39 | 29 | 68 | 57.4% | 52 | 50 | 102 | 51.0% | Career | 74 | 107 | 181 | 40.9% | 6 | 28 | 34 | 17.6% | 22 | 24 | 46 | 47.8% | 51 | 49 | 100 | 51.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Richey Reneberg | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1986 | 1512 | 107.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.23 | 1989 | 1492 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 1987 | 1672 | 145.5 | — | — | — | — | -22 | -111 | -30 | 54.2% | +0.40 | 2–4 (33%) | 6–10 (38%) | 100.4 | -1.09 | 1990 | 1478 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| 1988 | 1677 | 138.5 | — | — | — | — | -20 | -76 | -41 | 45.5% | -0.19 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–5 (0%) | 91.9 | -2.96 | 1991 | 1504 | 104.7 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | — | 57.1% | +0.57 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.21 |
| 1989 | 1691 | 146.0 | — | — | — | — | +32 | -131 | -6 | 52.6% | +0.34 | 6–8 (43%) | 8–6 (57%) | 99.7 | -2.41 | 1992 | 1546 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | +65 | -88 | — | 35.1% | -0.91 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–5 (29%) | 103.3 | +0.26 |
| 1990 | 1822 | 152.0 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -278 | -123 | 56.1% | +0.54 | 13–8 (62%) | 9–9 (50%) | 103.8 | -0.36 | 1993 | 1647 | 128.4 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -196 | — | 44.8% | -0.40 | 6–6 (50%) | 8–5 (62%) | 105.4 | +0.61 |
| 1991 | 1801 | 136.9 | +1.06 | +1.57 | 1.040 | 50.8% | +19 | -158 | -128 | 56.7% | +0.32 | 16–7 (70%) | 18–10 (64%) | 108.7 | +1.77 | 1994 | 1630 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -172 | +21 | 44.4% | -0.32 | 3–13 (19%) | 9–10 (47%) | 92.4 | -0.61 |
| 1992 | 1712 | 137.1 | +0.01 | -0.27 | 0.979 | 49.4% | +15 | — | -40 | 50.0% | -0.10 | 5–8 (38%) | 9–4 (69%) | 101.0 | +0.14 | 1995 | 1619 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 42.3% | -0.55 | 9–8 (53%) | 11–11 (50%) | 102.9 | -0.27 |
| 1993 | 1757 | 149.2 | +1.89 | +3.46 | 1.174 | 52.9% | +20 | -183 | -68 | 58.3% | +0.77 | 6–9 (40%) | 9–13 (41%) | 95.4 | +0.80 | 1996 | 1709 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | -23 | 47.9% | -0.08 | 13–8 (62%) | 13–18 (42%) | 102.9 | +1.26 |
| 1994 | 1810 | 145.9 | +1.16 | +3.35 | 1.110 | 51.8% | +16 | -205 | -128 | 57.6% | +0.59 | 8–10 (44%) | 11–5 (69%) | 101.8 | -0.33 | 1997 | 1694 | 135.4 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -281 | +7 | 48.3% | -0.18 | 8–7 (53%) | 16–10 (62%) | 105.2 | +0.62 |
| 1995 | 1775 | 141.8 | +0.54 | +0.52 | 0.988 | 49.5% | +7 | -140 | -93 | 49.1% | +0.04 | 5–6 (45%) | 10–8 (56%) | 100.5 | -2.46 | 1998 | 1649 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | +16 | — | +23 | 42.9% | -0.50 | 7–7 (50%) | 8–11 (42%) | 98.6 | -0.31 |
| 1996 | 1800 | 153.8 | +1.89 | +2.79 | 1.110 | 51.9% | -7 | -121 | +20 | 55.6% | +0.52 | 14–8 (64%) | 12–12 (50%) | 103.0 | -3.44 | 1999 | 1578 | 123.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -177 | +52 | 39.1% | -0.78 | 1–7 (13%) | 3–5 (38%) | 90.9 | -0.57 |
| 1997 | 1681 | 138.3 | +1.16 | -0.37 | 0.980 | 49.5% | +6 | -19 | +159 | 48.9% | -0.08 | 9–7 (56%) | 9–9 (50%) | 101.3 | -1.18 | 2000 | 1615 | 127.5 | — | — | — | — | -72 | -159 | +102 | 44.2% | -0.34 | 7–3 (70%) | 6–9 (40%) | 105.2 | +0.30 |
| 1998 | 1596 | 119.7 | -1.25 | -0.80 | 0.936 | 48.8% | +52 | +19 | +180 | 43.3% | -0.34 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–2 (60%) | 99.0 | +1.17 | 2001 | 1514 | 96.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +91 | 15.0% | -1.90 | — | 0–2 | — | +0.77 |
| 1999 | 1626 | 124.0 | -0.07 | +0.69 | 1.005 | 50.3% | +16 | — | +87 | 44.7% | -0.40 | 1–4 (20%) | 3–3 (50%) | 95.8 | -0.78 | 2002 | 1525 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.75 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.13 |
| 2000 | 1630 | 106.1 | 0.00 | -0.50 | 1.009 | 50.3% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.50 | — | — | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1920 | 150.0 | +0.99 | +1.68 | 1.057 | 50.9% | +15 | -127 | -13 | 52.9% | +0.28 | 92–89 (51%) | 107–97 (52%) | 102.3 | -1.95 | Career | 1732 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -170 | +36 | 43.3% | -0.43 | 59–60 (50%) | 77–88 (47%) | 101.6 | +0.62 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Martin | 4 | 8 | 12 | Sep 3, 1999 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 5 | 7 | 12 | Oct 24, 1996 | H2H |
| Thomas Enqvist | 1 | 10 | 11 | Mar 11, 1998 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 0 | 9 | 9 | Aug 5, 1999 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 2 | 7 | 9 | Mar 20, 1996 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jun 23, 1999 | — |
| Patrick Rafter | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 24, 2000 | — |
| Thomas Johansson | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 4, 2000 | — |
| Byron Black | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 18, 1999 | — |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 16, 2002 | — |