H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Richey Reneberg vs Pat Cash H2H: 0-1
Pat Cash holds a 1–0 lead over Richey Reneberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pat Cash leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pat Cash won the 1989 Australian Open second round 6-3 6-3 6-7 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1989* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Pat Cash | 6-3 6-3 6-7 4-6 6-3 | Richey Reneberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richey Reneberg | #867 | #20 | 1,333 | 1,923 | 305 | 261 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Pat Cash | #734 | #4 | 658 | 2,098 | 210 | 134 | 61.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richey Reneberg | Pat Cash | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #10 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #337 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #67 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1987 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #79 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #24 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #128 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #7 | 2,022 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 1989 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–9 | 71.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 1 | 5 |
| 24 | 1990 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,927 | 1 | 5 |
| 25 | 1991 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #27 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #81 | 1,872 | 1 | 6 |
| 26 | 1992 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #108 | 1,806 | 1 | 6 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #203 | 1,817 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 1994 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #34 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,767 | 1 | 6 |
| 30 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #250 | 1,677 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,682 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,616 | 1 | 6 |
| 32 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #379 | 1,574 | 1 | 6 |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #202 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #573 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |