H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Richey Reneberg vs T. Wilkison H2H: 2-1
Richey Reneberg holds a 2–1 lead over T. Wilkison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Richey Reneberg leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richey Reneberg won the 1990 Toronto Indoor second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 1990* | Toronto Indoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Richey Reneberg | 6-2 6-3 | T. Wilkison | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1987* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | T. Wilkison | 6-3 5-7 7-6 | Richey Reneberg | Match data |
| Aug 13, 1987* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Richey Reneberg | 6-4 6-4 | T. Wilkison | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richey Reneberg | #867 | #20 | 1,333 | 1,923 | 305 | 261 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| T. Wilkison | #1,167 | #23 | 269 | 1,894 | 294 | 298 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richey Reneberg | T. Wilkison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #54 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #337 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #95 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1987 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #79 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #71 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #128 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #61 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1989 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,678 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1990 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #39 | 1,765 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1991 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #27 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #44 | 1,807 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1992 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #55 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1994 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #34 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,672 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1995 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,599 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #210 | 1,540 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,682 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #202 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #573 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |