H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Richey Reneberg vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 0-1
Thomas Johansson holds a 1–0 lead over Richey Reneberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 1999 Wimbledon first round 5-7 7-6(5) 6-3 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Thomas Johansson | 5-7 7-6(5) 6-3 4-6 6-1 | Richey Reneberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richey Reneberg | #867 | #20 | 1,333 | 1,923 | 305 | 261 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Thomas Johansson | #586 | #7 | 2,365 | 1,969 | 336 | 277 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Richey Reneberg | Thomas Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #422 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #337 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #117 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #79 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #128 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1990 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1991 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #27 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #39 | 1,825 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1992 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #14 | 1,746 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | 1994 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #34 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #30 | 1,855 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,892 | 1 | 9 |
| 31 | 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,682 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #71 | 1,723 | 1 | 9 |
| 32 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,759 | 1 | 9 |
| 33 | 1999 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #202 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #136 | 1,673 | 1 | 9 |
| 34 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #573 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |