H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Richey Reneberg vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 0-1

Thomas Johansson holds a 1–0 lead over Richey Reneberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 1999 Wimbledon round of 128 5-7 7-6(5) 6-3 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Richey Reneberg
USA Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Thomas Johansson
SWE Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Johansson #21 5-7 7-6(5) 6-3 4-6 6-1 Richey Reneberg #248 Match data Jun 23, 1999* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Richey Reneberg #867 #20 1,333 1,920 305 262 53.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Thomas Johansson #586 #7 2,365 1,969 337 279 54.7% 1 1 0 0 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Richey Reneberg Thomas Johansson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1993 2–1 66.7% — 1,534 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1994 0–2 0.0% #486 1,496 0 0
20 1986 2–3 40.0% #337 1,512 0 0 1995 1–3 25.0% #117 1,491 0 0
21 1987 15–13 53.6% #79 1,671 0 0 1996 28–21 57.1% #60 1,763 0 0
22 1988 14–19 42.4% #128 1,676 0 0 1997 32–27 54.2% #39 1,700 0 2
23 1989 23–21 52.3% #80 1,690 0 0 1998 46–30 60.5% #17 1,897 0 2
24 1990 37–25 59.7% #23 1,821 0 0 1999 21–23 47.7% #39 1,736 0 3
25 1991 32–18 64.0% #27 1,801 0 1 2000 22–26 45.8% #39 1,819 0 4
26 1992 18–20 47.4% #95 1,712 0 1 2001 42–23 64.6% #18 1,875 0 6
27 1993 37–26 58.7% #30 1,756 0 2 2002 26–22 54.2% #14 1,745 1 7
28 1994 33–24 57.9% #34 1,809 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1995 22–23 48.9% #57 1,775 0 2 2004 29–20 59.2% #30 1,853 1 8
30 1996 37–25 59.7% #32 1,799 0 3 2005 42–24 63.6% #13 1,892 1 9
31 1997 18–20 47.4% #73 1,680 0 3 2006 11–16 40.7% #71 1,706 1 9
32 1998 10–15 40.0% #154 1,595 0 3 2007 23–23 50.0% #62 1,756 1 9
33 1999 6–9 40.0% #202 1,625 0 3 2008 12–18 40.0% #136 1,668 1 9
34 2000 1–1 50.0% #573 1,630 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Richey Reneberg Thomas Johansson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1986 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6%
22 1988 4 8 12 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1997 15 13 28 53.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 15 5 20 75.0%
23 1989 17 10 27 63.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1998 27 14 41 65.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 7 18 61.1%
24 1990 20 13 33 60.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1991 12 8 20 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2000 17 17 34 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1992 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 11 1 12 91.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 1993 26 13 39 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 2002 17 12 29 58.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1994 25 13 38 65.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 11 14 25 44.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 2004 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
30 1996 18 15 33 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2005 19 14 33 57.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 3 13 76.9% 9 2 11 81.8%
31 1997 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 5 7 12 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
32 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2007 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
33 1999 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
34 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 171 140 311 55.0% 43 43 86 50.0% 39 29 68 57.4% 52 50 102 51.0% — 197 155 352 56.0% 29 58 87 33.3% 46 30 76 60.5% 65 36 101 64.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 342/395 of Richey Reneberg's and 214/218 of Thomas Johansson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Richey Reneberg Thomas Johansson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 1991 44/50 3.7 2.9 58.8% 69.8% 50.2% 57.7% 46.9% 61.5% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 35/38 4.0 3.0 56.6% 71.6% 49.4% 58.4% 41.5% 61.9% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 57/63 4.2 2.1 54.4% 72.8% 53.8% 57.1% 47.2% 64.1% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 51/57 4.6 2.4 54.5% 71.7% 53.1% 53.9% 45.2% 62.8% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 38/45 5.3 3.0 52.5% 71.3% 51.5% 58.0% 36.8% 62.0% 37.5% 2004 49/49 9.3 2.1 55.5% 77.2% 52.5% 62.8% 42.3% 66.2% 36.3%
30 1996 52/62 4.9 2.5 54.6% 72.9% 53.0% 62.6% 51.7% 63.7% 40.3% 2005 66/66 8.9 2.0 56.8% 77.3% 55.7% 59.6% 40.9% 68.0% 36.5%
31 1997 29/38 5.2 2.4 55.9% 72.4% 52.2% 58.1% 37.2% 63.5% 35.8% 2006 26/27 10.2 2.8 56.6% 75.4% 50.5% 61.8% 40.1% 64.6% 33.3%
32 1998 21/25 5.8 3.7 56.8% 69.4% 48.4% 60.7% 38.8% 60.4% 37.0% 2007 46/46 8.4 2.5 57.6% 74.9% 51.6% 60.3% 42.1% 65.1% 32.1%
33 1999 13/15 6.3 3.3 55.6% 72.8% 47.9% 46.8% 39.5% 61.8% 38.4% 2008 27/30 7.4 2.8 58.4% 72.2% 47.4% 60.8% 38.1% 61.8% 33.5%
34 2000 2/2 2.5 0.5 48.7% 69.0% 50.6% 64.3% 33.3% 59.6% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 342/567 4.6 2.7 55.3% 71.7% 51.7% 57.7% 44.1% 62.7% 39.5% — 214/616 8.9 2.3 56.9% 75.9% 52.4% 60.9% 41.0% 65.8% 34.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Richey Reneberg Thomas Johansson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1535 112.9 — — — — +33 — — 62.5% +0.63 1–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.12
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1496 98.1 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 1–1 — +0.29
20 1986 1512 107.9 — — — — — +15 — 33.3% -0.33 2–0 0–1 — +0.23 1995 1492 111.1 — — — — +52 — — 22.2% -1.56 — 0–1 — -0.10
21 1987 1672 145.5 — — — — -22 -111 -30 54.2% +0.40 2–4 (33%) 6–10 (38%) 100.4 -1.09 1996 1764 141.3 — — — — -11 -212 -55 54.7% +0.46 10–7 (59%) 5–8 (38%) 103.6 +0.21
22 1988 1677 138.5 — — — — -20 -76 -41 45.5% -0.19 1–5 (17%) 0–5 (0%) 91.9 -2.96 1997 1700 139.6 — — — — +91 -202 -7 52.7% +0.37 11–10 (52%) 3–17 (15%) 91.8 +2.54
23 1989 1691 146.0 — — — — +32 -131 -6 52.6% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 8–6 (57%) 99.7 -2.41 1998 1897 149.9 — — — — +15 -423 -194 57.3% +0.51 12–13 (48%) 22–20 (52%) 98.8 -1.44
24 1990 1822 152.0 — — — — +35 -278 -123 56.1% +0.54 13–8 (62%) 9–9 (50%) 103.8 -0.36 1999 1736 138.9 — — — — +44 -276 — 50.9% -0.01 9–9 (50%) 8–8 (50%) 99.5 +1.29
25 1991 1801 136.9 +1.06 +1.57 1.040 50.8% +19 -158 -128 56.7% +0.32 16–7 (70%) 18–10 (64%) 108.7 +1.77 2000 1819 138.5 — — — — -4 -362 -90 50.0% +0.02 5–7 (42%) 17–12 (59%) 100.3 -0.07
26 1992 1712 137.1 +0.01 -0.27 0.979 49.4% +15 — -40 50.0% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 9–4 (69%) 101.0 +0.14 2001 1875 151.0 — — — — -19 -371 -11 61.5% +0.73 9–9 (50%) 15–12 (56%) 102.6 -2.47
27 1993 1757 149.2 +1.89 +3.46 1.174 52.9% +20 -183 -68 58.3% +0.77 6–9 (40%) 9–13 (41%) 95.4 +0.80 2002 1746 143.8 — — — — +68 -189 +40 53.6% +0.32 8–8 (50%) 11–12 (48%) 97.6 -0.26
28 1994 1810 145.9 +1.16 +3.35 1.110 51.8% +16 -205 -128 57.6% +0.59 8–10 (44%) 11–5 (69%) 101.8 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1775 141.8 +0.54 +0.52 0.988 49.5% +7 -140 -93 49.1% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 100.5 -2.47 2004 1854 148.2 +3.00 +0.83 1.073 51.2% +2 -283 +23 56.9% +0.25 8–8 (50%) 18–11 (62%) 104.6 -2.69
30 1996 1800 153.8 +1.89 +2.79 1.110 51.9% -7 -121 +20 55.6% +0.52 14–8 (64%) 12–12 (50%) 103.0 -3.44 2005 1893 147.3 +4.53 -0.04 1.141 52.0% -3 -302 +122 61.8% +0.69 10–8 (56%) 22–15 (59%) 103.3 +0.08
31 1997 1681 138.4 +1.16 -0.37 0.980 49.5% +6 -19 +159 48.9% -0.08 9–7 (56%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -1.18 2006 1706 134.4 +1.47 -2.65 0.941 49.2% +107 -165 +193 41.4% -0.30 4–5 (44%) 7–12 (37%) 92.2 +0.60
32 1998 1596 119.7 -1.25 -0.80 0.936 48.8% +52 +19 +180 43.3% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 99.0 +1.17 2007 1757 138.7 +0.88 -2.95 0.918 48.8% +47 -210 +10 45.9% -0.46 7–5 (58%) 14–13 (52%) 101.2 -2.55
33 1999 1626 124.0 -0.07 +0.69 1.005 50.3% +16 — +87 44.7% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 95.8 -0.78 2008 1668 132.9 -0.51 -1.77 0.876 47.7% +18 -129 +90 34.8% -0.74 4–2 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 98.1 -1.34
34 2000 1630 106.1 0.00 -0.50 1.009 50.3% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.10 2009 1652 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1920 150.0 +0.99 +1.68 1.057 50.9% +15 -127 -13 52.9% +0.28 92–89 (51%) 107–97 (52%) 102.3 -1.95 — 1969 149.0 +2.39 -1.00 1.014 50.2% +27 -268 +7 53.4% +0.24 98–93 (51%) 151–153 (50%) 99.5 -0.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.