H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rick Fagel vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 0-1
Roscoe Tanner holds a 1–0 lead over Rick Fagel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roscoe Tanner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Roscoe Tanner won the 1977 Tokyo Outdoor fourth round 4-6 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 1977* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Roscoe Tanner | 4-6 6-0 6-3 | Rick Fagel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rick Fagel | #759 | #60 | 0 | 1,614 | 47 | 99 | 32.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Roscoe Tanner | #789 | #4 | 0 | 2,158 | 595 | 298 | 66.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rick Fagel | Roscoe Tanner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–9 | 0.0% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 16–10 | 61.5% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 66–28 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1977 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #78 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 65–24 | 73.0% | #9 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1978 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #135 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 70–28 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,012 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1979 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #113 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 52–30 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,880 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 1980 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #135 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 59–24 | 71.1% | #11 | 1,935 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1981 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #99 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 61–19 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,025 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | 1982 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #13 | 1,993 | 1 | 16 |
| 29 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #12 | 1,901 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,779 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #36 | 1,872 | 1 | 17 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #249 | 1,679 | 1 | 17 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,661 | 1 | 17 |