H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Rick Fagel vs Tim Gullikson H2H: 1-1

Rick Fagel and Tim Gullikson are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rick Fagel leads 1–0 on clay, while Tim Gullikson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Gullikson won the 1977 Hong Kong Open round of 32 7-6 6-1.

USA Age 72 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings
USA Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Gullikson 7-6 6-1 Rick Fagel #60 Match data Nov 10, 1977* R32 Hong Kong Open ATP 250 Hard
Rick Fagel #148 6-2 6-3 Tim Gullikson Match data Jul 14, 1977* R32 Cincinnati Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rick Fagel #759 #60 0 1,615 47 99 32.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tim Gullikson 2,012 0 0 0 0 4 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rick Fagel Tim Gullikson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1972 0–1 0.0% 1,489 0 0
21 1975 0–1 0.0% #308 1,481 0 0
23 1977 9–15 37.5% #75 1,526 0 0
24 1978 11–18 37.9% #135 1,565 0 0
25 1979 7–19 26.9% #113 1,512 0 0
26 1980 9–16 36.0% #135 1,552 0 0
27 1981 11–19 36.7% #99 1,583 0 0
28 1982 0–9 0.0% 1,455 0 0
29 1983 0–1 0.0% #217 1,445 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rick Fagel Tim Gullikson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1972 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1975 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 8 10 18 44.4% 1975 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 9 12 21 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1976 6 6 12 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 5 16 21 23.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 12 5 17 70.6% 10 9 19 52.6% 18 3 21 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
26 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 8 12 20 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 10 24 58.3%
27 1981 4 5 9 44.4% 7 13 20 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5%
28 1982 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 7 20 65.0%
29 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 8 14 42.9%
30 1982 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 11 14 21.4%
31 1983 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1984 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 7 12 41.7%
33 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
34 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 9 19 28 32.1% 37 69 106 34.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 95 70 165 57.6% 29 32 61 47.5% 54 33 87 62.1% 64 62 126 50.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rick Fagel Tim Gullikson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1972 1490 98.9 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.13
21 1975 1481 103.2 0.0% -3.00 -0.08
23 1977 1527 120.3 -35 +48 42.3% -0.58 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 99.2 +0.64 1975 1526 110.0 +36 37.5% -1.38 2–2 (50%) 1–0 -0.56
24 1978 1566 131.1 -73 +52 39.4% -0.76 2–5 (29%) 5–3 (63%) 101.3 +1.23 1976 1587 121.0 -10 -24 -68 42.9% -0.56 2–6 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 93.4 +0.26
25 1979 1512 123.8 -14 +13 31.8% -1.24 4–6 (40%) 1–7 (13%) 95.8 -1.38 1977 1869 146.4 -101 -197 0 62.5% +0.89 15–7 (68%) 6–5 (55%) 112.6 +0.69
26 1980 1553 134.1 -48 +9 40.4% -0.47 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 +0.01 1978 1956 150.8 +44 -254 -114 58.9% +0.42 9–5 (64%) 15–10 (60%) 108.5 -1.31
27 1981 1583 136.8 -16 -9 37.8% -0.85 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 104.0 -1.02 1979 1983 152.5 +54 -246 -92 58.0% +0.51 14–2 (88%) 12–6 (67%) 111.6 -2.02
28 1982 1456 94.2 +50 +72 13.0% -3.13 0–2 +0.72 1980 1880 148.2 +25 +22 56.7% +0.43 8–9 (47%) 10–11 (48%) 94.1 -3.86
29 1983 1446 100.9 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.10 1981 1868 150.9 +30 -139 -33 55.2% +0.51 9–6 (60%) 9–12 (43%) 98.3 -4.50
30 1982 1729 145.3 +53 +39 41.8% -0.47 7–8 (47%) 7–14 (33%) 92.5 -3.75
31 1983 1759 134.2 +16 -67 +54 54.9% +0.15 6–8 (43%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +0.12
32 1984 1613 132.9 +12 +73 +194 41.2% -0.58 5–8 (38%) 9–6 (60%) 97.8 -1.08
33 1985 1585 121.6 +9 +164 43.5% -0.26 2–4 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 94.1 +0.41
34 1986 1583 108.2 -10 22.2% -1.89 2–1 (67%) -0.44
Career 1615 132.2 -27 +24 36.1% -0.97 16–28 (36%) 11–19 (37%) 96.9 +0.24 2013 149.7 +23 -151 +14 53.2% +0.20 79–65 (55%) 83–78 (52%) 102.3 -3.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.