H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Robby Ginepri vs Jan Hajek H2H: 0-1
Jan Hajek holds a 1–0 lead over Robby Ginepri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan Hajek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan Hajek won the 2010 Australian Open first round 7-6(2) 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2014 | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Robby Ginepri | 6-2 6-2 | Jan Hajek | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2010* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jan Hajek | 7-6(2) 7-5 6-1 | Robby Ginepri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robby Ginepri | #1,221 | #15 | 1,525 | 1,927 | 185 | 194 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jan Hajek | #1,199 | #71 | 644 | 1,729 | 25 | 70 | 26.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robby Ginepri | Jan Hajek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #15 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #134 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #475 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #100 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #95 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #106 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #106 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2014 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #223 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |