H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Robby Ginepri vs Paul Capdeville H2H: 0-1
Paul Capdeville holds a 1–0 lead over Robby Ginepri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Capdeville leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Capdeville won the 2008 Indianapolis third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 43
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2008 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Paul Capdeville | 6-4 6-2 | Robby Ginepri | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robby Ginepri | #1,221 | #15 | 1,525 | 1,927 | 185 | 194 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Paul Capdeville | #1,186 | #76 | 960 | 1,730 | 36 | 67 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robby Ginepri | Paul Capdeville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #15 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #149 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #134 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #111 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #100 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #166 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2014 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #223 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |