H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Robby Ginepri vs Somdev Devvarman H2H: 1-0
Robby Ginepri holds a 1–0 lead over Somdev Devvarman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Robby Ginepri leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robby Ginepri won the 2010 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 41
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2015 | Houston | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Somdev Devvarman | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Robby Ginepri | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | Q2 | Hard | Somdev Devvarman | 7-6(4) 2-6 6-2 | Robby Ginepri | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2010* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Robby Ginepri | 6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-2 | Somdev Devvarman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robby Ginepri | #1,221 | #15 | 1,525 | 1,927 | 185 | 194 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Somdev Devvarman | #1,347 | #62 | 771 | 1,799 | 49 | 70 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robby Ginepri | Somdev Devvarman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1116 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #15 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1033 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #134 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #126 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #108 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #100 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #84 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #664 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #90 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #138 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2014 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #223 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #909 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |