H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Robert Kendrick vs Amer Delic H2H: 0-2
Amer Delic holds a 2–0 lead over Robert Kendrick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amer Delic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amer Delic won the 2008 Australian Open first round 6-4 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 46
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
BIH
Age 44
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2008* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Amer Delic | 6-4 7-5 6-2 | Robert Kendrick | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2007* | Houston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Amer Delic | 6-3 1-6 7-5 | Robert Kendrick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Kendrick | #1,118 | #69 | 968 | 1,729 | 35 | 78 | 31.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Amer Delic | #1,041 | #60 | 728 | 1,718 | 25 | 53 | 32.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robert Kendrick | Amer Delic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #447 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #134 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #164 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #93 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #140 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #137 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #105 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #219 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #142 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2011 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #224 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |