H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Robert Kendrick vs Paul Goldstein H2H: 0-1
Paul Goldstein holds a 1–0 lead over Robert Kendrick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Goldstein leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Goldstein won the 2007 Indianapolis third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 46
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2007 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Paul Goldstein | 6-4 6-4 | Robert Kendrick | Match data |
| Jan 13, 2003 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | Robert Kendrick | 6-3 3-6 8-6 | Paul Goldstein | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Kendrick | #1,118 | #69 | 968 | 1,729 | 35 | 78 | 31.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paul Goldstein | #1,120 | #58 | 668 | 1,746 | 85 | 115 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robert Kendrick | Paul Goldstein | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #781 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1011 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #432 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #189 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #134 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #81 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #107 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #105 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #190 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #67 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #142 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #166 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2011 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #224 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |