H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Robert Seguso vs Bill Scanlon H2H: 0-1
Bill Scanlon holds a 1–0 lead over Robert Seguso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1984 Montreal / Toronto second round 7-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1984* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Bill Scanlon | 7-6 7-5 | Robert Seguso | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Seguso | #773 | #22 | 242 | 1,885 | 86 | 90 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robert Seguso | Bill Scanlon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #321 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #209 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1985 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #56 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1986 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #28 | 1,843 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #135 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1988 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #37 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1989 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1990 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #367 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #818 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 |