H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Roberto Arguello vs Damir Keretic H2H: 0-1
Damir Keretic holds a 1–0 lead over Roberto Arguello in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Damir Keretic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Damir Keretic won the 1986 Rome second round 6-3 6-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 63
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 1986* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Damir Keretic | 6-3 6-7 6-2 | Roberto Arguello | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberto Arguello | #829 | #38 | 144 | 1,718 | 60 | 82 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Damir Keretic | #837 | #58 | 35 | 1,740 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roberto Arguello | Damir Keretic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #365 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #50 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #239 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #69 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #231 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #86 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #177 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #177 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #190 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #68 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #217 | 1,465 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #412 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |