H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Roberto Bautista Agut vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 1-3

Ernests Gulbis holds a 3–1 lead over Roberto Bautista Agut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ernests Gulbis leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2014 Moscow semifinal 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberto Bautista Agut
Spain Age 38 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Ernests Gulbis
LAT Age 38 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roberto Bautista Agut #16 6-4 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #13 Match data Oct 18, 2014* SF Moscow ATP 250 Hard
Ernests Gulbis #22 7-6(0) 4-6 6-2 Roberto Bautista Agut #53 Match data Mar 13, 2014* R16 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Ernests Gulbis #23 6-3 5-7 6-4 Roberto Bautista Agut #51 Match data Feb 21, 2014* R16 Marseille ATP 250 Hard
Ernests Gulbis #36 6-1 6-2 Roberto Bautista Agut #62 Match data Sep 21, 2013* QF St. Petersburg ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roberto Bautista Agut #232 #9 3,215 2,104 415 296 58.4% 0 0 0 1 11 12
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,140 221 233 48.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2008 22–21 51.2% #53 1,810 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,723 0 0
21 2009 0–1 0.0% #281 1,552 0 0 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,851 0 1
22 2010 0–1 0.0% #170 1,512 0 0 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,776 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,726 0 2
24 2012 3–10 23.1% #80 1,658 0 0 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,940 0 4
25 2013 26–22 54.2% #58 1,801 0 0 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,918 0 6
26 2014 44–21 67.7% #15 2,029 0 2 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2015 41–29 58.6% #25 1,997 0 2 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2016 49–23 68.1% #14 1,992 0 4 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,718 0 6
29 2017 46–22 67.6% #20 2,003 0 6 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,814 0 6
30 2018 33–18 64.7% #24 1,934 0 8 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,534 0 6
31 2019 40–22 64.5% #9 1,945 0 9 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,563 0 6
32 2020 14–8 63.6% #13 1,962 0 9 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
33 2021 29–23 55.8% #19 1,845 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2022 31–19 62.0% #21 1,878 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 2023 17–21 44.7% #57 1,747 0 11 — — — — — — —
36 2024 23–21 52.3% #51 1,813 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 2025 15–22 40.5% #90 1,771 0 12 — — — — — — —
38 2026 4–13 23.5% #232 1,631 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Ernests Gulbis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 4 7 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 13 14 27 48.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 14 18 32 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 18 15 33 54.5% 11 5 16 68.8% — — — — — — — —
22 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 15 16 31 48.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 6 9 15 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2012 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 21 9 30 70.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
25 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2014 23 14 37 62.2% 17 5 22 77.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2014 25 15 40 62.5% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — 2015 7 14 21 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2015 25 17 42 59.5% 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2016 2 7 9 22.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2016 37 16 53 69.8% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2017 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2017 30 13 43 69.8% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2018 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 2018 19 11 30 63.3% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 2019 25 13 38 65.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2020 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2021 18 13 31 58.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 19 13 32 59.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 10 12 22 45.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 12 13 25 48.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 4 10 14 28.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 255 181 436 58.5% 103 85 188 54.8% 57 30 87 65.5% — — — — — 135 139 274 49.3% 66 68 134 49.3% 15 24 39 38.5% 5 2 7 71.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 698/711 of Roberto Bautista Agut's and 453/454 of Ernests Gulbis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Ernests Gulbis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/4 8.0 2.0 63.8% 74.9% 44.3% 73.7% 42.7% 63.8% 35.2%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 20/20 8.3 3.9 63.1% 74.8% 47.6% 71.0% 39.1% 64.7% 33.9%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 42/43 9.8 4.2 60.0% 74.6% 50.2% 64.8% 39.0% 64.8% 36.8%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 43/43 9.2 3.8 62.9% 71.8% 47.3% 56.4% 41.8% 62.9% 34.7%
21 2009 1/1 0.0 1.0 58.3% 65.3% 45.7% 44.4% 50.0% 57.1% 37.5% 2010 49/49 8.9 3.2 63.0% 76.3% 50.9% 62.7% 34.2% 67.0% 37.1%
22 2010 1/1 0.0 1.0 64.5% 57.1% 55.6% 62.5% 0.0% 56.6% 34.7% 2011 40/40 9.3 4.3 60.8% 73.9% 47.5% 57.1% 36.9% 63.6% 34.7%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 29/29 11.3 5.0 58.4% 75.6% 47.7% 54.4% 37.2% 63.9% 33.9%
24 2012 13/13 2.5 2.8 60.9% 65.2% 44.8% 55.4% 37.6% 57.1% 38.8% 2013 50/50 7.8 3.6 61.1% 77.2% 51.0% 64.8% 45.0% 66.9% 39.9%
25 2013 48/48 2.2 1.7 70.5% 65.0% 53.7% 58.9% 47.9% 61.7% 40.2% 2014 62/62 10.5 3.7 60.3% 78.5% 51.2% 62.0% 41.9% 67.6% 36.8%
26 2014 64/65 2.7 2.0 69.2% 70.0% 53.4% 63.0% 46.8% 64.8% 39.9% 2015 35/35 9.7 5.7 58.2% 74.7% 45.5% 63.1% 39.4% 62.2% 33.4%
27 2015 70/70 3.7 1.9 64.3% 72.5% 56.4% 65.4% 44.7% 66.7% 37.8% 2016 21/21 9.5 5.0 56.4% 73.3% 48.0% 61.3% 31.9% 62.0% 33.5%
28 2016 65/72 3.5 2.2 65.4% 69.7% 53.2% 58.5% 42.5% 64.1% 40.0% 2017 14/14 10.4 5.6 54.7% 76.8% 46.1% 61.5% 31.7% 63.1% 34.8%
29 2017 67/68 2.9 2.2 63.1% 71.4% 55.6% 57.2% 45.1% 65.5% 42.0% 2018 15/15 9.7 5.9 57.1% 76.3% 49.2% 62.0% 43.5% 64.6% 34.4%
30 2018 51/51 3.2 2.0 63.6% 71.6% 54.1% 64.0% 46.4% 65.4% 39.4% 2019 23/23 7.6 4.6 55.4% 73.3% 46.3% 51.5% 39.8% 61.2% 33.2%
31 2019 61/62 3.9 1.7 65.7% 73.0% 56.5% 61.9% 43.0% 67.4% 39.0% 2020 4/4 12.3 4.5 59.9% 74.9% 60.2% 74.7% 24.4% 68.9% 30.8%
32 2020 22/22 3.6 2.3 66.8% 67.1% 55.5% 59.9% 43.5% 63.2% 42.3% 2021 2/2 4.0 5.0 53.7% 73.7% 41.0% 27.8% — 59.2% 13.4%
33 2021 51/52 3.3 1.7 65.3% 70.8% 55.0% 58.0% 47.3% 65.1% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 48/50 2.9 1.7 66.1% 71.2% 54.3% 60.5% 42.5% 65.4% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 38/38 3.9 1.8 65.7% 70.2% 56.1% 48.4% 39.3% 65.2% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 44/44 2.7 2.0 68.2% 68.5% 53.6% 61.0% 46.3% 63.7% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 37/37 2.7 2.1 66.2% 67.9% 49.2% 54.3% 41.2% 61.7% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 17/17 3.3 1.5 68.3% 63.4% 49.5% 55.5% 21.5% 59.1% 29.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 698/711 3.2 2.0 66.0% 70.0% 54.2% 59.6% 43.8% 64.5% 39.1% — 453/454 9.4 4.2 60.1% 75.4% 48.9% 61.2% 38.9% 64.7% 35.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roberto Bautista Agut Ernests Gulbis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1557 106.4 +0.61 -1.74 0.972 49.0% +9 — — 54.5% +0.09 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.44
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1638 127.1 +1.64 -1.59 0.958 49.8% +27 -146 -146 41.5% -0.21 0–3 (0%) 3–7 (30%) 93.8 -0.98
19 2007 1516 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1810 149.1 +2.28 +0.51 1.045 50.8% -39 -165 -225 51.3% +0.16 8–9 (47%) 8–11 (42%) 102.1 -2.63
20 2008 1520 105.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1723 144.0 -0.05 -0.80 0.937 49.0% +7 -100 -119 42.6% -0.38 5–9 (36%) 8–10 (44%) 97.2 -2.12
21 2009 1552 103.5 +1.07 -0.83 0.875 47.6% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — 0.00 2010 1851 159.8 +3.64 +1.63 1.123 51.4% -51 -37 — 58.1% +0.42 6–7 (46%) 12–9 (57%) 103.9 -0.88
22 2010 1512 104.6 +2.71 -1.02 0.798 45.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — 0.00 2011 1776 145.2 +0.75 -1.54 0.951 49.0% +9 -28 — 42.3% -0.40 8–4 (67%) 4–13 (24%) 96.1 -0.23
23 2011 1527 111.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1726 133.5 +0.26 -1.91 0.941 48.9% +5 -29 -123 46.3% -0.29 5–8 (38%) 9–6 (60%) 101.4 -0.91
24 2012 1658 125.8 -3.50 +0.03 0.904 47.8% +40 — — 24.1% -1.07 1–1 0–2 — +0.77 2013 1941 162.6 +3.27 +3.69 1.205 53.4% -4 -117 -220 60.3% +0.87 11–10 (52%) 13–10 (57%) 102.2 -3.49
25 2013 1801 149.4 -1.14 +2.56 1.049 50.8% -5 -134 -122 55.2% +0.16 9–7 (56%) 16–4 (80%) 112.8 +0.31 2014 1918 165.6 +3.67 +1.09 1.137 52.1% -25 +186 -209 60.8% +0.75 13–3 (81%) 19–12 (61%) 109.5 -0.35
26 2014 2030 165.9 +1.17 +3.88 1.135 52.4% -48 -120 -136 63.1% +0.79 16–6 (73%) 12–7 (63%) 111.4 +0.17 2015 1766 142.0 -1.53 -1.16 0.884 48.0% +13 +125 -70 38.8% -0.65 5–8 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 95.1 +2.08
27 2015 1997 164.8 +2.59 +2.45 1.136 52.3% +5 -85 -72 58.5% +0.74 8–11 (42%) 11–12 (48%) 95.5 -0.10 2016 1786 137.9 -1.04 -1.59 0.883 47.8% -66 +115 — 36.5% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 93.9 -0.62
28 2016 1993 166.6 +0.70 +3.83 1.115 52.0% +18 -28 -84 60.2% +0.64 16–10 (62%) 18–13 (58%) 101.1 +1.33 2017 1718 129.7 +0.08 -0.70 0.945 48.9% -62 +100 +21 43.6% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.5 -0.03
29 2017 2004 165.0 +2.13 +5.30 1.216 53.4% +17 -43 -69 64.5% +0.96 9–9 (50%) 18–15 (55%) 98.3 +1.62 2018 1815 134.1 -0.05 -0.20 0.973 49.9% -54 — +57 52.1% +0.04 5–1 (83%) 3–4 (43%) 105.6 +0.38
30 2018 1934 153.9 +1.51 +3.16 1.139 52.4% +2 +33 +16 58.9% +0.65 13–4 (76%) 10–15 (40%) 100.4 +1.35 2019 1535 124.6 -2.30 -2.09 0.855 47.1% +93 +104 +202 32.7% -1.18 1–4 (20%) 5–7 (42%) 93.7 +0.02
31 2019 1945 168.2 +2.85 +3.28 1.198 52.6% +17 -23 +127 62.6% +0.84 13–10 (57%) 8–14 (36%) 96.4 -1.44 2020 1563 122.8 -0.48 +0.51 0.992 50.6% +114 — — 53.8% +0.31 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.23
32 2020 1963 158.1 +0.25 +4.32 1.148 52.4% +5 -47 — 61.8% +0.84 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 -0.99 2021 1510 94.9 -2.66 -2.22 0.328 40.2% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.24
33 2021 1845 157.0 +1.63 +3.89 1.161 52.3% +59 +10 +180 55.6% +0.44 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 90.9 +0.34 2022 1483 103.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1879 155.5 +1.66 +3.64 1.172 52.8% +3 -22 +178 60.7% +0.92 5–8 (38%) 10–11 (48%) 94.4 +1.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1747 145.2 +1.16 +0.69 1.049 50.3% +31 +36 +265 47.1% +0.03 8–8 (50%) 12–12 (50%) 98.4 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1814 141.9 -0.50 +1.21 1.022 50.6% -33 -28 +201 51.8% +0.04 6–7 (46%) 11–5 (69%) 102.5 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1771 133.9 -1.44 +0.34 0.951 49.2% -82 -25 +183 39.6% -0.44 7–4 (64%) 6–11 (35%) 97.4 -1.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1632 116.3 -4.26 -3.11 0.711 44.4% +43 +10 — 27.5% -1.57 2–2 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2104 160.3 +0.95 +2.89 1.104 51.7% +5 -39 +70 56.5% +0.48 125–104 (55%) 151–142 (52%) 99.9 +0.42 — 2141 151.4 +1.33 +0.06 1.009 50.1% -8 +11 -95 49.0% +0.01 74–72 (51%) 98–109 (47%) 99.7 -2.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.