H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Roberto Bautista Agut vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 1-3
Ernests Gulbis holds a 3–1 lead over Roberto Bautista Agut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ernests Gulbis leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2014 Moscow semifinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2014* | Moscow | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-4 6-4 | Ernests Gulbis | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2014* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Ernests Gulbis | 7-6(0) 4-6 6-2 | Roberto Bautista Agut | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2014* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Ernests Gulbis | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Roberto Bautista Agut | Match data |
| Sep 21, 2013* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Ernests Gulbis | 6-1 6-2 | Roberto Bautista Agut | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberto Bautista Agut | #180 | #9 | 3,215 | 2,106 | 411 | 294 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
| Ernests Gulbis | #893 | #10 | 2,725 | 2,139 | 221 | 232 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roberto Bautista Agut | Ernests Gulbis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #141 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #90 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #281 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #24 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2012 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #24 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #58 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2014 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 2,005 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #81 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2015 | 41–29 | 58.6% | #25 | 1,997 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2016 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,991 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #199 | 1,716 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2017 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,999 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #95 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2018 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,932 | 0 | 8 | 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #226 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #9 | 1,940 | 0 | 9 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,562 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,960 | 0 | 9 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,509 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2021 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #21 | 1,870 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #90 | 1,771 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #180 | 1,631 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |